Multi-rate torsional driveline joint with adaptive stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle driveline systems lack the ability to provide a multi-rate torsional stiffness, which is essential for efficient energy transfer and noise vibration harshness (NVH) management, as they either offer constant stiffness or fail to adapt to varying torque levels effectively.

Innovation Solution

The driveline joint design incorporates an outer member, an inner member, a cage, and a biasing member, featuring ball grooves and complementary grooves, along with a preload mechanism, to adjust torsional stiffness in response to input torque levels, providing low stiffness at low torques and increased stiffness as torque thresholds are exceeded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple one-piece bar drive shaft is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to provide multi-rate torsional stiffness is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive shaft structureVSAvoidtorsional stiffness adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The drive shaft is divided into multiple modular sections (inner shaft, outer shaft, intermediate sections) that can independently rotate relative to each other. This segmentation allows each section to contribute differently to torsional stiffness based on operating conditions, enabling multi-rate stiffness characteristics while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drive shaft incorporates dynamic elements including spring-loaded ball grooves and complementary grooves that automatically adjust the engagement state based on torque levels. At low torque, the balls disengage allowing relative rotation and lower stiffness; at high torque, the balls engage to provide higher stiffness, creating a dynamically adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If constant torsional stiffness is provided, then the manufacturing precision is simplified, but the NVH performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness consistencyVSAvoidvibration and harshness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically changes the torsional stiffness parameter in response to varying torque conditions. The spring-loaded ball groove mechanism transitions between engaged and disengaged states, effectively changing the stiffness parameter from high to low or vice versa, thereby optimizing NVH performance across different operating regimes without requiring complex manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multi-rate torsional stiffness is implemented, then the NVH performance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolationVSAvoidjoint mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive shaft incorporates self-regulating mechanisms where the spring-loaded balls automatically engage or disengage based on the applied torque, without requiring external control systems. The system serves itself by using the operational conditions (torque levels) to automatically adjust its stiffness characteristics, reducing the need for additional control components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The design places the inner shaft within the outer shaft, with intermediate sections nested between them. The ball grooves and complementary grooves are nested within the shaft structure, allowing multiple functional elements to occupy compact spaces. This nesting approach enables complex multi-rate stiffness functionality while maintaining a space-efficient and relatively simple overall configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Ease of manufacture

If a single torsional stiffness is used, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the energy transfer efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft productionVSAvoidenergy transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive shaft employs dynamic torque-coupling mechanisms that automatically adjust the torsional stiffness based on power transmission requirements. During high-torque conditions, the mechanism engages to provide high stiffness for efficient energy transfer; during low-torque conditions, it disengages to allow flexibility. This dynamic adaptation optimizes energy transfer efficiency across varying operating conditions without requiring complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances NVH performance by isolating powertrain components at low torques and enabling efficient energy transfer at higher torques, improving overall driveline efficiency and vehicle performance.

Implementation Method 1

The first biasing member is received within the outer member and is disposed between the second portion and the end portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The cage is configured to position a plurality of balls relative to the plurality of ball grooves and the plurality of complementary ball grooves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10041546B2Multi-rate torsional bar
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORP
  • US10041546B2 patent drawing
  • US10041546B2 patent drawing
  • US10041546B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driveline joint includes an outer member, an inner member, and a biasing member. The outer member is connected to a first shaft and has a back wall, an end portion, and an inner surface extending between the back wall and the end portion. The inner member is connected to a second shaft and has a first end, a second end, and an outer surface extending between the first end and the second end. The biasing member is disposed between the back wall and the first end and resists translation of the inner member relative to the outer member.