Multi-Reactor Toner Process Reduces Coarse Particles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional emulsion/aggregation processes for toner compositions are time-consuming and generate coarse particles, leading to increased reactor fouling and the need for wet sieving, which hampers throughput and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A multi-reactor process is introduced, where the slurry is processed through multiple reactors for homogenization, heating, and cooling, allowing for faster and more uniform temperature control, reducing coarse particle formation and reactor fouling, and potentially eliminating the need for wet sieving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional single-reactor emulsion/aggregation process is used, then process simplicity is maintained, but coarse particles are generated and wet sieving is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process is divided into multiple reactors, each performing a specific function: first reactor for aggregation, second reactor for coalescence. This segmentation allows precise control over particle formation stages, preventing coarse particle generation while maintaining uniform size distribution, and eliminates the need for wet sieving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wet sieving step is extracted and eliminated from the process. The multi-reactor system inherently produces particles with such uniform size distribution that coarse particle removal becomes unnecessary, simplifying the overall process while improving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If conventional aggregation/coalescence process is used, then process simplicity is maintained, but process time is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the aggregation and coalescence steps into separate reactors operating in sequence, each reactor can be optimized for its specific function and operated at optimal conditions, significantly reducing the total process time while increasing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-reactor system enables continuous operation where aggregation in the first reactor feeds directly into coalescence in the second reactor, eliminating idle time and maintaining continuous useful action throughout the process, thereby increasing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If conventional aggregation process is used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but reactor fouling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor performanceVSAvoidreactor system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Separating aggregation and coalescence into different reactors prevents fouling material from accumulating in a single reactor. The first reactor handles aggregation with controlled fouling, while the second reactor performs coalescence on already-formed aggregates, reducing overall fouling and improving reactor performance and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances process throughput, reduces downtime, and produces toner particles with a narrower size distribution and reduced coarse particle content, improving overall efficiency and product quality.

Implementation Method 1

discharging the slurry from the first reactor to a second reactor through a homogenizer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

heating the slurry in the second reactor to form aggregated particles in said slurry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

heating the aggregated particles and slurry in the third reactor to coalesce the aggregated particles into toner particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

cooling the toner particles in the fourth reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS8080360B2Toner preparation processes
Publication Date: 2011.12.20 XEROX CORP
  • US8080360B2 patent drawing
  • US8080360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making toner particles, includes: mixing a latex emulsion, a colorant emulsion, an optional was emulsion, and optional additives in a first reactor to form a slurry; discharging the slurry from the first reactor to a second reactor through a homogenizer; heating the slurry in the second reactor to form aggregated particles in said slurry; discharging the aggregated particles and slurry from the second reactor to a third reactor; heating the aggregated particles and slurry in the third reactor to coalesce the aggregated particles into toner particles; discharging the toner particles and slurry from the third reactor to a fourth reactor; cooling the toner particles; optionally classifying said toner particles to remove coarse particles; and optionally washing and drying said toner particles, wherein the first reactor, second reactor, third reactor, and fourth reactor are at least two different reactors.