Multi-Resolution Pathology Foundation Model for Label-Efficient Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI models for pathology require large amounts of labeled data, are site-specific, and do not leverage the multi-scale nature of Whole Slide Images (WSIs, limiting their applicability and practical use in routine pathology practice.

Innovation Solution

A foundation model with a pre-trained backbone that utilizes a diverse, unlabeled dataset across multiple sites and scales, employing specialized loss functions like Fourier reconstruction and masked autoencoders to generate vector embeddings, which are then adapted using task-specific heads for various pathology tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional AI models are trained on large amounts of labeled data for pathology tasks, then model performance improves, but data collection cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The model performs preliminary self-supervised learning on unlabeled WSIs before being deployed for specific pathology tasks. This pre-training on diverse unlabeled data from multiple sites establishes a robust foundation that reduces the need for extensive task-specific labeled data collection later

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The model uses self-supervised learning where it learns to reconstruct and predict properties of WSIs without human annotations. The system serves itself by generating its own training signals from unlabeled data through reconstruction losses and predictive tasks, eliminating dependency on expensive labeled datasets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If conventional AI models are trained on site-specific data, then model accuracy for that site improves, but applicability to other sites decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidsite applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The model is designed with universal architecture and training objectives that enable it to process and learn from WSIs from multiple sites and scanners. The self-supervised learning framework and multi-scale processing capabilities make the model adaptable to different sites without retraining, achieving both accuracy and versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The model employs multi-scale processing with adjustable patch sizes and resolution levels to adapt to different WSI characteristics from various sites. By changing processing parameters rather than retraining, the model maintains accuracy across diverse site-specific data variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional models process WSIs at single resolution, then processing speed improves, but ability to capture multi-scale features decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmulti-scale feature capture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The model segments WSIs into patches of different sizes and processes them at multiple resolution levels. This segmentation approach allows simultaneous capture of fine cellular details and broader tissue architecture, achieving multi-scale feature extraction while maintaining computational efficiency through hierarchical processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If foundation model is trained on diverse unlabeled data from multiple sites and scales, then adaptability improves, but training complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel adaptabilityVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The training employs feedback mechanisms through self-supervised learning objectives where the model's own predictions and reconstructions provide training signals. The reconstruction loss and predictive tasks create closed-loop feedback that guides learning from diverse unlabeled data without requiring complex external annotation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The model uses parameter-efficient training approaches with frozen backbone components and trainable task-specific heads. By changing which parameters are trained rather than the entire model architecture, the system handles diverse multi-scale data effectively while controlling training complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250336065A1Multi-resolution foundation model for pathology
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 PATHAI INC
  • US20250336065A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336065A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336065A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, a method, a system, or a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium are described for a foundation model for use in pathology, by providing an input dataset representing a plurality of pathology images as input to a backbone of the foundation model, wherein the plurality of pathology images comprises patches having different levels of pixel resolution; producing, with the backbone of the foundation model, a plurality of vector embeddings based on the input dataset; adjusting weights associated with the backbone of the foundation model based on the plurality of vector embeddings by using a Fourier reconstruction loss function configured to separate portions of the patches in accordance with a high-frequency band and a low-frequency band; and storing the foundation model on at least one storage device.