Multi-Reticle Interposer Layout for High Core Count Die Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High core count compute and graphics devices in HPC platforms face challenges with large die complexes exceeding standard reticle size limits, leading to high costs and performance degradation due to the need for precise alignment and bandwidth issues in existing interposer solutions.

Innovation Solution

The use of interposers with a multiple reticle form factor, featuring saw streets between reticle regions to increase alignment tolerance and reduce costs, allowing for larger form factors without the need for precise alignment and maintaining high-density routing between compute dies and SoCs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple exposure solutions (reticle stitching) are used to fabricate interposers larger than reticle size limit, then larger form factor interposers can be manufactured, but manufacturing cost increases due to requirement for precise alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterposer footprintVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The interposer is divided into multiple separate interposer substrates, each within the reticle size limit. These substrates are then joined together using embedded bridge architectures to form a larger functional interposer structure, eliminating the need for expensive multiple exposure processes while achieving the required large footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If embedded bridge architectures are used to join interposer substrates, then interposers can be constructed from smaller substrates, but bandwidth degradation occurs due to fan-out and fan-in routing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterposer constructibilityVSAvoidbandwidth performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The signal routing function is extracted from the embedded bridge architecture and relocated to the package substrate level. High-speed signals are routed directly on the package substrate, bypassing the embedded bridges, thereby maintaining bandwidth performance while still allowing the interposer to be constructed from smaller substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Area of stationary object

If embedded bridge architectures are used to join interposer substrates, then interposers can be constructed from smaller substrates, but power consumption increases due to increased frequency requirements for maintaining bandwidth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterposer constructibilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The high-frequency signal transmission function is extracted from the interposer level and moved to the package substrate level. This eliminates the need to increase wire frequency to maintain bandwidth, thereby reducing power consumption while still enabling construction from smaller substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Area of stationary object

If die is split into two halves with each half sitting above an interposer, then large die complexes can be accommodated, but latency increases due to increased interconnect length for pitch translation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie complex accommodationVSAvoidmemory latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The interconnect routing is moved from the vertical dimension (through embedded bridges between interposers) to the horizontal dimension (on the package substrate). This dimensional shift reduces the effective path length for signal transmission, thereby reducing latency while still accommodating large die complexes through the multi-substrate interposer construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20240312919A1Interposer solution for high core count compute platforms
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 INTEL CORP
  • US20240312919A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312919A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312919A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosed herein include a multi-die module. In an embodiment, the multi-die module comprises an interposer, where the interposer comprises a first region and a second region. In an embodiment, the first region is spaced apart from the second region by a saw street. In an embodiment, a first die is over the interposer, where the first die is positioned over the saw street. In an embodiment, a second die is adjacent to a first end of the first die, and a third die is adjacent to a second end of the first die opposite from the first end.