Multi-Robot Cell Scheduling for Malfunction Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In fabrication environments, collaborative robots often experience increased downtime due to malfunctions, leading to costly repairs and collisions when one robot fails, especially in multi-robot setups, as all robots halt work to prevent collisions, which is inefficient and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that allow robots to continue working by removing the malfunctioning robot and replacing it with a functioning one at a scheduled location, ensuring collision-free operation and minimizing downtime through coordinated scheduling and real-time collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all robots halt when one robot encounters a malfunction to prevent collisions, then collision prevention is achieved, but overall productivity decreases due to increased downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidoverall productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot group is segmented into functioning robots and malfunctioning robots. The malfunctioning robot is isolated and removed from the collaborative group, allowing the remaining functioning robots to continue work independently without being forced to halt, thus maintaining productivity while ensuring safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The malfunctioning robot is extracted or removed from the collaborative robot group. This extraction allows the remaining robots to continue their operations without interruption, resolving the contradiction by separating the problematic element while preserving the overall system's productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If a larger number of robots work collaboratively on a part, then productivity increases, but the likelihood of malfunction and downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated malfunction detection and robot removal. When a robot malfunctions, the system automatically identifies and removes it from the collaborative group without requiring external intervention, allowing the system to maintain high productivity even with multiple robots by quickly resolving failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to monitor robot status in real-time. When a malfunction is detected, the feedback triggers automatic removal of the malfunctioning robot, allowing the system to adapt and maintain reliability while operating with a larger number of robots

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11110606B2Coordinating work within a multi-robot cell
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 THE BOEING CO
  • US11110606B2 patent drawing
  • US11110606B2 patent drawing
  • US11110606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for robot control. One embodiment is a method for coordinating operations of robots performing work on a part. The method includes assigning a group of robots to a part, initiating work on the part via the group of robots, determining that a robot within the group is unable to continue performing work at a first location of the part, removing the robot from the group while other robots of the group continue performing the work, adding a functioning robot to the group at a second location that the robot is scheduled to occupy, and continuing work on the part via the group of robots.