Multi-Robot Object Handling With Shared Imaging and Task Sequencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The assembly of large structures, such as aircraft components, is challenging due to the complexity of coordinating multiple robots working collectively, which requires high processing power and time, particularly when handling large, flexible objects that need precise positioning and monitoring to avoid collisions.

Innovation Solution

A robot arrangement where multiple robots sequentially and simultaneously interact with an object, sharing a single device (like an image capture device) and a mounting point, allowing for reduced processing power and equipment costs by minimizing the need for multiple devices and trackers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple robots work collectively on the same component simultaneously, then productivity increases, but processing power requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the assembly process into distinct sequential tasks (first task, second task, third task) that can be performed by different robots at different times. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high productivity through parallel task execution while maintaining manageable complexity by having each robot handle specific, well-defined portions of the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic task allocation where robots can transition between different tasks based on completion status. The system dynamically adjusts which robot performs which task at any given moment, allowing optimal utilization of available robots while reducing the need for complex simultaneous coordination of all robots on all tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple image capture devices are used to monitor multiple robots, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and processing power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject positioning accuracyVSAvoidnumber of tracking devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the image capture device universal by having multiple robots share a single device for imaging tasks. The device is used sequentially by different robots for different tasks, eliminating the need for each robot to have its own dedicated imaging device. This reduces device complexity while maintaining measurement precision through proper calibration and positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a mounting point as an intermediary structure that enables the image capture device to be transferred between robots. This mediator facilitates the sharing of the imaging device without requiring direct integration with each robot, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining the ability to capture images from multiple robotic perspectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If each robot has its own end effector with imaging device, then adaptability improves, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot functionalityVSAvoidequipment costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by creating a shared image capture device that serves multiple robots. The device can be mounted on different robots and used for various imaging tasks, providing the same functionality that would otherwise require separate dedicated devices for each robot. This maintains adaptability while significantly reducing equipment complexity and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables robots to perform imaging functions themselves by equipping them with the ability to carry and operate the shared image capture device. Rather than requiring external imaging systems for each robot, the robots serve their own imaging needs by sequentially utilizing the shared device, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If a single image capture device is shared between robots, then device complexity reduces, but loss of time during device transfer increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of devicesVSAvoiddevice transfer time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having robots position themselves and prepare to receive the image capture device before the current robot completes its imaging task. This anticipation of the device transfer reduces actual transfer time, as the receiving robot is already in position and ready to accept the device immediately when the current robot finishes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by overlapping the imaging task completion with the device transfer process. Rather than having complete idle time between imaging tasks on different robots, the system ensures that as one robot finishes using the device, another robot is ready to take it immediately, minimizing non-productive transition time and maintaining continuous utilization of the imaging device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP4606535A1Robot arrangement for interacting with an object
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • EP4606535A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4606535A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4606535A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A robot arrangement for interacting with an object, comprising: a plurality of robots adjacent an object; the plurality of robots configured to interact with the object sequentially such that: a first robot of the plurality of robots is configured to perform a first portion of a first task on the object and then, whilst the first robot is not interacting with the object, a second robot of the plurality of robots is configured to perform a second portion of the first task on the object, and the plurality of robots are configured to simultaneously interact with the object, before or after completion of the first task, so as to collectively perform a second task on the object.