Multi-Robot Social Learning for Drift-Resilient Factory Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-robot systems in smart factories face challenges in maintaining robustness and resilience due to stochastic dynamics, environmental disturbances, internal misalignments, and partial observability, leading to inaccuracies and potential failures.

Innovation Solution

A partially connected wireless social network with Bayesian network-based social learning, stochastic gradient descent for state tracking, and distributed soft trust decision-making is implemented to estimate system regret and drift states, enabling resilient operation through distributed machine learning and consensus maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-robot systems operate in dynamic production environments, then productivity and flexibility are improved, but robustness and resilience deteriorate due to stochastic dynamics and environmental disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidrobustness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where robots continuously monitor system state through social learning, detect drift and regret states, and adjust their actions accordingly. This closed-loop control enables the system to maintain productivity while compensating for disturbances in real-time, thus preserving robustness in dynamic environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Each robot autonomously determines its own actions based on local evidence and social evidence from neighboring robots. The distributed decision-making architecture allows the system to self-regulate and maintain resilience without centralized control, enabling both high productivity and robustness simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If social learning with distributed evidence sharing is implemented, then system resilience is improved, but communication complexity and information processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresilienceVSAvoidcommunication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the multi-robot system into local communities where robots share evidence only with neighboring robots in their community. This segmentation of the communication network reduces overall complexity while maintaining resilience through distributed social learning within each community.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each robot performs social learning using local evidence from its immediate community and combines it with social evidence from neighboring robots. This localised approach to information sharing reduces communication overhead compared to global evidence sharing, while still achieving system-wide resilience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If distributed decision-making is used, then system adaptability is improved, but coordination accuracy deteriorates due to partial observability and information asymmetry

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcoordination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces social evidence as an intermediary that mediates between local observations and global system state. Robots use social evidence from neighboring robots to compensate for partial observability, enabling accurate coordination decisions while maintaining distributed adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines local evidence obtained by each robot with social evidence from neighboring robots to form a comprehensive system regret state belief. This merging of information sources compensates for partial observability and information asymmetry, improving coordination accuracy while preserving distributed decision-making adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12502770B2Resilient multi-robot system with social learning for smart factories
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US12502770B2 patent drawing
  • US12502770B2 patent drawing
  • US12502770B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for operating a multi-robot system (MRS) are disclosed. In some aspects, each robot of the MRS can: determine a local system regret state belief based on local evidence obtained by the robot itself and social evidence provided by other robots in a social community, determine a local system drift state belief based on the local system regret state belief, determine a next action based on the local system regret state belief and the local system drift state belief, and execute the next action. Local system regret state belief is generally an estimation of a system regret state for the MRS. Local system drift state belief is generally an estimate of a system drift state for the MRS.