Multi-Robot Task Handoff Using Real-Time Status Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current AI agent collaboration methods lack efficient dynamic communication and task delegation mechanisms, leading to suboptimal task completion times and resource utilization in environments where multiple robots operate together.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for collaboration between robots, involving communication devices that receive instructions for task execution and sensor-equipped processors to manage task completion and charging, enabling decentralized learning and efficient task distribution among robots.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple robots operate independently without dynamic communication, then each robot can execute tasks autonomously, but task completion time increases and resource utilization decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion efficiencyVSAvoidtask completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent robot systems into a collaborative network where robots share intelligence and coordinate tasks. The system combines individual robot capabilities with collective decision-making to achieve faster task completion than independent operation could provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where robots continuously communicate task progress, status, and environmental information to the network. This real-time feedback enables dynamic task reassignment and coordination, reducing idle time and improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If robots share intelligence and communicate continuously, then situational awareness and task delegation improve, but communication overhead and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication system into modular components, with each robot having standardized communication interfaces. This segmentation allows individual robots to maintain simplicity while the collective system achieves high situational awareness through structured information exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal communication protocols that enable robots to exchange multiple types of information (task status, environmental data, resource availability) through standardized interfaces. This universality reduces the need for specialized communication channels for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If robots dynamically reassign tasks based on real-time status, then resource utilization improves, but coordination overhead and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidprocessing power required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining task priorities, robot capabilities, and decision-making rules before dynamic reassignment occurs. This preparation reduces the computational burden during real-time coordination, as the system only needs to evaluate predefined criteria rather than perform complex optimization from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If robots operate in coordinated sequences with task delegation, then overall task efficiency improves, but task coordination complexity and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidtask coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic task coordination where the coordination structure adapts based on real-time robot status, task progress, and environmental conditions. Rather than fixed hierarchical control, the system dynamically adjusts coordination patterns to match current operational needs, reducing unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12070847B1Collaborative intelligence of artificial intelligence agents
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 AI INC
  • US12070847B1 patent drawing
  • US12070847B1 patent drawing
  • US12070847B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for collaboration between a first robot and a second robot, including: an application of a communication device configured to receive at least one input designating an instruction for the first robot to execute a first task and an instruction for the second robot to execute a second task after the first robot completes the first task; the first robot, including a medium storing instructions that when executed by a processor of the first robot effectuates operations including: actuating the first robot to execute the first task; and actuating the first robot to dock at a charging station upon completion of the first task; and the second robot including a medium storing instructions that when executed by a processor of the second robot effectuates operations including actuating the second robot to execute the second task upon receiving a signal indicating the first task is complete by the first robot.