Interlocking Multi-Rotor Mixer for Polymer Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixers for polymer processing, particularly in the rubber industry, face inefficiencies in mixing performance and temperature control, leading to suboptimal mixing quality and throughput.

Innovation Solution

The mixer employs multiple interlocking rotors within a mixing chamber, allowing for enhanced mixing performance through increased engagement areas and improved temperature control, with features like internal temperature sensors and dispensing devices to enhance mixing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If two rotors are arranged in the mixing chamber, then the device complexity is low, but the mixing performance and engagement area are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing performanceVSAvoidnumber of rotors
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing chamber is segmented by introducing more than two rotors, each responsible for specific zones. This segmentation increases the total engagement area and improves mixing performance by distributing the mixing workload across multiple rotors, directly resolving the contradiction between mixing performance and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a conventional two-rotor configuration to a multi-rotor arrangement where rotors are positioned at different heights and angular positions within the mixing chamber. This dimensional expansion creates multiple engagement areas simultaneously, increasing overall mixing effectiveness without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If more than two rotors are arranged in the mixing chamber, then the engagement area and mixing performance are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal engagement areaVSAvoidnumber of rotors
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple rotors are merged into a coordinated system where each rotor contributes to the overall mixing action. The rotors work synergistically with interlocking teeth that engage across rotor boundaries, creating a unified mixing mechanism that achieves large engagement area without linearly increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each rotor in the multi-rotor system is designed with universal functionality, featuring interlocking teeth that can engage with adjacent rotors and perform mixing functions in multiple zones. This multi-functionality allows each rotor to contribute to several engagement areas, increasing total effective area without proportionally increasing the number of components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional mixing is used, then the device structure is simple, but the temperature control and mixing quality are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing qualityVSAvoidmixing chamber structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Temperature sensors are installed within the mixing chamber to provide real-time feedback on mixing temperature. This feedback enables precise temperature control during the mixing process, ensuring optimal mixing quality while managing the increased structural complexity through intelligent monitoring and control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves higher mixing quality and throughput while reducing material loss and operational costs, enabling better temperature control and incorporation of additives.

Implementation Method 1

the mixing material is mixed by rotating the rotors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

The addition of one or more components, in particular a polymer, can be carried out via a plunger that presses the components into the mixing chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

mixture components, for example powdery components, can accumulate on the lower rotor during filling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20250387950A1Mixer for polymer processing and method of operating a mixer
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 HARBURG FREUDENBERGER MASCHINENBAU GMBH
  • US20250387950A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387950A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387950A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mixer (1) for mixing a mixing material (13) in polymer processing comprises a mixing chamber (2) and more than two rotors (6a-6d) arranged in the mixing chamber (2). In particular, the rotors (6a-6d) can be configured to interlock.