Multi-Row Bearing Cage Structure for High-Speed Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-row rolling-element bearings with snap cages are unsuitable for high rotational speeds due to potential misalignment, vibration issues, and inadequate lubrication, limiting their application to lower speed environments.

Innovation Solution

A multi-row rolling-element bearing design featuring a cage with separate side parts and bridge elements that form pockets to receive rolling elements from two rows, allowing for increased stability, reduced vibration, and optimized axial installation space, with the option for different numbers and sizes of rolling elements to adapt to various load conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a snap cage is used to guide and retain rolling elements in multi-row bearings, then the cage can be installed after rolling elements are in place, but the cage jumps out or misaligns at higher rotational speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cage installationVSAvoidcage stability at high speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is divided into two separate half-cages that are assembled together after the rolling elements are installed between the bearing rings. This segmentation allows the cage to be installed in a simplified manner while the subsequent joining creates a stable structure suitable for high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rolling elements are installed between the bearing rings before the cage is assembled and attached. This preliminary arrangement of rolling elements enables the cage to be securely fastened to the rolling elements, preventing misalignment and jump-out at high rotational speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If a snap cage is used to retain rolling elements, then installation is simplified, but the cage generates vibrations that affect bearing performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cage installationVSAvoidvibration generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the cage into two half-cages allows for more precise fitting and reduced gaps compared to a single snap cage. This segmentation enables better alignment and reduces vibration generation while maintaining installation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cage is constructed from vibration-damping materials or composite structures that reduce the generation and transmission of vibrations. This material selection mitigates the harmful vibrations while preserving the ease of installation advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If a snap cage is used to guide rolling elements, then post-installation cage attachment is enabled, but the cage is weak and unsuitable for high rotational speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cage installationVSAvoidcage strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is divided into two half-cages that are joined together with fastening elements. This segmented design allows for simplified installation while the joining process creates a strong, unified structure capable of withstanding high rotational speeds and loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rolling elements are positioned between the bearing rings before the cage is assembled and secured. This preliminary arrangement allows the cage to be firmly attached to the rolling elements, significantly increasing the overall strength and stability of the bearing assembly for high-speed applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If the cage is designed to snap onto rolling elements from outside, then post-installation cage attachment is possible, but the axial installation space is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cage installationVSAvoidaxial installation space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is divided into two half-cages that can be assembled together in the axial direction after the rolling elements are installed. This segmentation allows the cage to be constructed around the existing rolling elements, minimizing the additional axial space required compared to installing a complete cage before rolling element insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12196256B2Multi-row rolling-element bearing
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US12196256B2 patent drawing
  • US12196256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-row rolling-element bearing includes first and second bearing rings and first and second rows of rolling elements therebetween. A cage between the first and second bearing rings has a first annular side part having a plurality of axially extending first bridge elements and a second annular side part having a plurality of axially extending second bridge elements connected to the first bridge elements to form bridges and to form pockets therebetween. At least one rolling element of the first row of rolling elements and at least one rolling element of the second row of rolling elements are located in each of the plurality of pockets.