Multi-Row Impeller Compressor Layout for Lower Windage Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compressors and pumps face inefficiencies due to windage losses and decreased power availability, particularly in the interface between rotational and static parts, limiting their ability to effectively increase fluid pressure.

Innovation Solution

A modular compressor or pump design featuring a central shaft with multiple rows of impellers and diffusers, along with magnetic interaction and adjustable speed, which allows for flexible adaptation to process modifications and improved operating conditions by optimizing the ratio of active to passive components, reducing windage losses, and enhancing power density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional compressor or pump design is used, then fluid pressure can be increased, but windage losses increase and power availability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewindage lossesVSAvoidpower availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is divided into multiple independent rows of impellers (n={2,3,4...}) arranged at the outer perimeter, each row capable of independent optimization. This segmentation allows reduction of windage losses in each segment while maintaining overall power output, directly addressing the contradiction between energy loss and power availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a multi-row impeller configuration in the radial dimension, with impellers arranged circumferentially around the rotor. This dimensional change from single-row to multi-row configuration increases power density and reduces windage losses by optimizing fluid flow paths across multiple radial stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Power

If more impeller rows are added to increase power, then power density increases, but axial length increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidaxial length
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing power by extending axial length with sequential impeller stages, the patent arranges multiple impeller rows circumferentially around the rotor in the radial dimension. This allows n rows of impellers to process fluid simultaneously, achieving high power density without proportional increase in axial length

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple impeller rows are nested circumferentially around the rotor, with each row processing fluid in parallel. The diffusers are similarly arranged in m=n-1 rows between the impeller rows, creating a compact nested configuration that maximizes power density within limited axial space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If modular design with multiple impeller rows is used, then efficiency and power per volume increase, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower per volumeVSAvoidmodular design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular rotor design with n rows of impellers and m=n-1 rows of diffusers creates a universal configuration that can be adapted to different power and flow requirements by simply changing the number of rows. This multi-functional design achieves high power per volume while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized modular units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes where n (number of impeller rows) and m (number of diffuser rows) can be adjusted to optimize performance for different applications. By varying these parameters, the system achieves different power densities and efficiency levels without fundamentally changing the modular architecture, balancing productivity gains with complexity management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular design increases efficiency and power per volume, reduces the number of bearings and electrical penetrations, and allows for quick adjustments in operating conditions, achieving higher power without substantial axial length increase, thus addressing windage losses and power density issues.

Implementation Method 1

a permanent magnet can be arranged on the rotor in close proximity with the central shaft with magnetic interaction with the motor windings defining a gap dl between the permanent magnet and the motor windings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic interaction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12049900B2Arrangement for pressurizing of fluid
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 VETCO GRAY SCANDINAVIA
  • US12049900B2 patent drawing
  • US12049900B2 patent drawing
  • US12049900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A compressor or pump stage is provided. The compressor or pump stage at least comprising a central shaft (8) and one rotor (3), where the axis of rotation of the rotor (3) is the central shaft (8) and where the rotor comprises a number, n, of rows of impellers (5) arranged at an outer perimeter of the rotor with an axial distance between neighbouring rows of impellers (5), where n={2, 3, 4 . . . }.