Multi-Scale Attention for Automated Histology Slide Tagging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for automated interpretation and classification of histology slides are limited in their ability to accurately and efficiently tag whole slide images with multiple relevant features at different magnifications, leading to inconsistencies and inefficiencies in histopathological analysis.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based method that utilizes a multi-scale approach with attention mechanisms to extract and aggregate visual features from whole slide images at various magnifications, enabling the prediction of multiple slide-level tags such as species, lesion type, and disease type, and associating these tags with the digital images for enhanced search and analysis capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated interpretation methods are used to classify histology slides, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to limitations in accurately tagging multiple features at different magnifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation speedVSAvoidtagging accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the histology slide into multiple patches at different magnification levels (e.g., 4x, 10x, 20x, 40x). Each patch is independently analyzed by the machine learning model to extract local features, which are then aggregated to form the final classification. This segmentation allows the system to process large slides efficiently while maintaining detailed local analysis for accurate multi-feature tagging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds the magnification dimension to the analysis by processing patches at multiple scales. Instead of a single magnification approach, the model analyzes the same tissue regions at different zoom levels, enabling it to capture both global slide characteristics and local cellular details simultaneously. This multi-scale approach resolves the contradiction by maintaining high precision across diverse features while preserving automation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple slide-level tags are predicted from patches at various magnifications, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to the multi-scale attention mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple processing streams at different magnification levels into a unified attention mechanism. The multi-scale attention module combines features from various patches and magnifications by computing attention weights that dynamically prioritize relevant regions. This merging strategy maintains high classification accuracy by integrating diverse visual information while managing model complexity through shared weight matrices across scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is designed with universal components that serve multiple functions. The same attention mechanism and feature extraction modules are reused across different magnification levels, allowing the model to handle various classification tasks (tissue type, disease state, cellular features) with a single unified architecture. This multi-functionality reduces overall complexity compared to having separate models for each magnification and task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If patches are sampled at multiple magnifications, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to processing multiple scales

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis consistencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary sampling and coarse analysis at lower magnifications before proceeding to higher magnifications. The multi-scale attention mechanism first identifies regions of interest at lower resolutions, then focuses computational resources on those specific areas at higher magnifications. This preliminary action at multiple scales ensures reliable and consistent analysis by establishing a hierarchical processing order that reduces redundant computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The processing pipeline maintains continuity by seamlessly integrating analysis across magnification scales. Rather than completing analysis at one magnification and then starting another, the system continuously processes patches at multiple scales in parallel, with the attention mechanism dynamically weighting contributions from each scale. This continuous multi-scale processing reduces total analysis time while maintaining reliability through consistent feature extraction across all magnifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12175778B2Systems and methods for automated tagging of digital histology slides
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 HISTOWIZ INC
  • US12175778B2 patent drawing
  • US12175778B2 patent drawing
  • US12175778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods and systems for performing an automated tagging of features in digital micrographs representing slides with tissue samples. Automated tagging of features may include automated entry of metadata associated with whole slide images or regions of the whole slide images.