Multi-Scale Meshing for Geological Time Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional models face challenges in accurately representing subsurface geological structures at different scales due to limitations in mesh resolution and computational resources, particularly in capturing precise geological structures at the reservoir scale while efficiently storing and modeling structures across various scales.

Innovation Solution

The approach involves computing U, V, and T functions on a regular cubic grid with anisotropic mesh refinement, iteratively increasing resolution to align iso-surfaces with geological markers, and using a multi-scale, multi-resolution mesh to represent geological structures at varying scales, allowing for more accurate modeling and storage of geological data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a fine mesh resolution is used to accurately capture geological structures at reservoir scale, then measurement precision improves, but computational resources and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of geological structure representationVSAvoidcomputational resources and storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The computational domain is divided into multiple scales: a coarse global mesh for overall geological structures and fine local meshes for reservoir-scale details. This segmentation allows accurate representation of geological structures where needed while using coarser resolution elsewhere, reducing overall computational resources and storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different mesh resolutions are applied to different regions of the geological model. Fine mesh resolution is used locally in reservoir-scale areas requiring high accuracy, while coarser resolution is used in broader regional contexts. This local quality approach optimizes the balance between measurement precision and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single uniform mesh resolution is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to accurately represent geological structures at multiple scales deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of mesh structureVSAvoidability to represent multi-scale geological structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple mesh resolutions are nested within each other, with fine local meshes embedded within the broader coarse global mesh framework. This nested structure allows the model to represent geological structures at multiple scales simultaneously, maintaining both simplicity in the overall structure and adaptability to multi-scale features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution adds a scale dimension to the mesh structure, organizing meshes hierarchically from global to local scales. This dimensional organization allows uniform management of complexity while capturing multi-scale geological variability, effectively resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If iterative mesh refinement is performed to align iso-surfaces with geological markers, then manufacturing precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracy of iso-surfaces with markersVSAvoidcomputational time for iterative refinement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The coarse global mesh is constructed first to establish the overall geological framework and identify regions requiring detailed analysis. This preliminary action allows subsequent fine local meshes to be targeted specifically at areas needing high precision, reducing the total number of iterations required and decreasing computational time while maintaining alignment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly refining the entire mesh to high resolution, the method applies fine mesh refinement only partially to specific local regions where geological markers indicate the need for high precision. This partial action achieves the required manufacturing precision for critical areas while avoiding the excessive computational time that would result from global refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10795053B2Systems and methods of multi-scale meshing for geologic time modeling
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 ASPEN PARADIGM HOLDING LLC
  • US10795053B2 patent drawing
  • US10795053B2 patent drawing
  • US10795053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for modeling a geological structure may include, in an initial model, computing a first function for a geological structure including a first set of iso-surfaces. A processor may detect if the first set of iso-surfaces intersect a set of geological markers within a threshold proximity. If not, the initial model may be corrected using an induced mesh having an increased cell resolution compare to the initial model for computing a second function for the geological structure including a second set of iso-surfaces that intersect the geological markers within the threshold proximity. A processor may insert the second set of iso-surfaces into a second model to locally increase its resolution relative to the initial model by dividing cells in the second model along the second set of iso-surfaces. For each new geological structure, the above steps may be repeated using the second model as the initial model.