Multi-section apparatus for dyeing, in an inert environment, of fabrics and yarns, with indigo and other reduction dyes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dyeing systems for denim fabrics with indigo dye are complex, costly, and environmentally inefficient due to high chemical consumption, waste generation, and inconsistent dyeing results, necessitating a more economical and sustainable solution.

Innovation Solution

A multi-section dyeing apparatus operating in an inert environment with indigo and other reduction dyes, utilizing a simplified structure and a novel multiphase dyeing method with spraying and minimal dye bath volume, enabling multiple dyeing operations without intermediate oxidation phases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional multi-tank indigo dyeing systems are used, then dyeing results can be achieved, but the system complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedyeing resultsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple dyeing tanks and oxidation chambers into a single integrated tank system. The tank contains multiple dyeing zones separated by partitions, with oxidation zones positioned above the dyeing zones. This merging eliminates the need for separate tanks and intermediate transfer mechanisms, significantly reducing system complexity while maintaining reliable dyeing results through the integrated multiphase process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single tank is segmented into multiple functional zones using internal partitions. These partitions create distinct dyeing chambers and oxidation chambers within the same tank, allowing multiple dyeing operations to occur simultaneously in different zones. The segmentation enables complex multiphase dyeing processes within a simplified single-tank structure, resolving the contradiction between system complexity and dyeing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If conventional dyeing methods with large dye bath volumes are used, then sufficient dyeing capacity is achieved, but chemical and water consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedyeing capacityVSAvoidchemical and water consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the dye bath by reducing its volume while increasing the intensity of the dyeing process. The smaller dye bath volumes in each zone, combined with the multiphase process and repeated impregnation cycles, maintain adequate dyeing capacity while significantly reducing the total amount of chemicals and water required compared to conventional large-volume single-phase systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous recycling and reuse of the dye bath throughout the multiphase process. The dye bath is continuously circulated between dyeing zones and oxidation zones, and excess dye bath is recovered and reused in subsequent cycles. This continuity maximizes the utilization of the dye bath, maintaining productivity while minimizing chemical and water consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If multiple impregnation and oxidation cycles are performed, then dye fixation and colour intensity improve, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedye fixationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic alternating cycles of impregnation and oxidation within the same tank system. The multiphase process repeatedly cycles yarn through dyeing zones and oxidation zones multiple times in succession. This periodic action enhances dye fixation and colour intensity through cumulative effect while maintaining compact processing space and reducing overall processing time compared to traditional sequential multi-tank systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Ease of operation

If traditional open-tank dyeing systems are used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but environmental sustainability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidenvironmental pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional open-tank systems with a closed tank system that creates an inert environment. The closed system prevents harmful emissions to the environment while containing the dyeing process. The inert atmosphere control integrates environmental protection into the operational process, maintaining ease of operation through automated atmosphere management while eliminating the harmful factors associated with open-tank dyeing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus achieves improved dye fixation, reduced chemical and water consumption, lower production costs, and enhanced dyeing performance, while maintaining ecological sustainability.

Implementation Method 1

dyeing, in an inert environment, of fabrics and yarns, with indigo and other reduction dyes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation prevention in inert environment: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

with indigo and other reduction dyes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS12404617B2Multi-section apparatus for dyeing, in an inert environment, of fabrics and yarns, with indigo and other reduction dyes
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 MASTER SRL
  • US12404617B2 patent drawing
  • US12404617B2 patent drawing
  • US12404617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A description is provided of an apparatus for dyeing a textile support comprising a single tank which is provided in its interior, in sequence, with: one first shaped cavity having a watertight function between the surrounding environment and the tank; one first internal partition wall, which is immersed in the lower part in the dye bath of the first shaped cavity for helping the watertight function; one first dyeing compartment and at least one second dyeing compartment which each comprise at least one return roller for the textile support, at least one dispensing device to dispense the dye bath on the textile support, and at least one squeezing device; a second shaped cavity containing the dye bath having a watertight function between the tank and the surrounding environment; and a second internal partition wall, which is immersed in the lower part in the dye bath of the second shaped cavity for helping the watertight.