Multi-Section Seat Reservation with Movement Burden Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seat reservation systems fail to provide a convenient solution when a user cannot obtain the same seat throughout a multi-section use route, leading to unnecessary movement burdens between seats.

Innovation Solution

A seat reservation system that searches for a combination of seats satisfying desired conditions and calculates a movement burden score to present the combination with the least movement burden to the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a combination of multiple seats is presented to the user when the same seat is not available throughout the use route, then the user can obtain a seat satisfying their desired condition, but the user experiences movement burden between seats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat availabilityVSAvoidmovement burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the evaluation parameter from simple seat availability to a composite score including movement burden. By calculating movement burden scores based on section boundaries and seat positions, the system transforms the seat selection problem into an optimized parameter selection problem, presenting combinations with the smallest movement burden scores first.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The movement burden score acts as an intermediary metric that mediates between seat availability and user convenience. Instead of directly presenting any available seat combination, the system uses this intermediate scoring mechanism to filter and rank combinations, thereby reducing the actual movement burden experienced by users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If all possible seat combinations are presented to the user, then the user has complete information to choose, but the system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of presenting all possible seat combinations (excessive action), the system calculates movement burden scores for all combinations but only presents a limited number of combinations with the smallest scores (partial action). This approach maintains sufficient information quality while significantly reducing system complexity and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the output parameter from presenting all combinations to presenting only top-ranked combinations based on movement burden scores. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain computational completeness internally while providing a simplified, manageable output to the user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the system calculates movement burden scores for all seat combinations, then the most convenient seat combination can be identified, but the calculation time and processing power increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat selection convenienceVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs complete movement burden calculations for all combinations internally but only processes and presents the top results. This partial output approach allows comprehensive analysis to be performed while limiting the time-consuming presentation phase to only the most relevant combinations, thereby reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary sorting and filtering of seat combinations based on movement burden scores before presenting them to the user. By pre-calculating and ranking combinations in advance, the system reduces the time required for real-time decision-making and minimizes the computational burden during the user interaction phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250307720A1Seat reservation system and seat reservation method
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20250307720A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307720A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307720A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor of a seat reservation system searches for a same seat satisfying a desired seat condition throughout a use route, based on seat arrangement information, seat reservation information, use route information, and seat condition information stored in a memory device. When the same seat does not exist, the processor searches for a combination of a plurality of seats satisfying the desired seat condition. When a plurality of combinations exist as a plurality of combination candidates, the processor executes a score calculation process of calculating, for each of the plurality of combination candidates, a movement burden score indicating a magnitude of burden of movement of the user between the plurality of seats, based on the seat arrangement information and the seat reservation information. The processor presents to the user via a user device, a combination candidate having a smallest movement burden score among the plurality of combination candidates.