Multi-Sensor Athlete Evaluation with Sport-Specific Heatmaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional athlete evaluation methods are subjective and lack uniform criteria, leading to inaccurate and incomplete assessments of athletic abilities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for evaluating athletes by processing location and dynamic data specific to the sport, using GPS, UWB, and IMU sensors, and image data to generate heatmaps and correct for match-specific factors, enabling objective and comprehensive evaluations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional EPTS is used to evaluate athletes, then machine-based objective evaluation is achieved, but only partial and fragmentary individual athletic abilities are provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomprehensiveness of evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources including location data from GPS/UWB, dynamic data from IMU sensors, and image data from cameras to create a comprehensive evaluation system that integrates fragmented athletic ability indicators into a unified assessment framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes multiple types of athletic data (location, dynamic, image) through a unified evaluation model that can assess various athletic abilities across different sports, making the evaluation system versatile and comprehensive rather than limited to specific fragmentary indicators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If conventional athlete evaluation methods are used, then evaluation process is simple, but criteria are ambiguous and not uniform leading to subjective evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidevaluation objectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms subjective evaluation criteria into quantifiable parameters by processing location coordinates, dynamic measurements, and image features through mathematical models that generate standardized evaluation scores, eliminating ambiguity while maintaining systematic assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If sport-specific data processing is implemented, then evaluation accuracy for specific sports is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesport-specific evaluation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies sport-specific processing rules and evaluation criteria tailored to each sport's unique characteristics while maintaining a unified overall framework, allowing customized data processing for each sport without requiring completely separate systems for each sport type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12383791B2Method for evaluating athlete, system and device performing the same
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 FITOGETHER INC
  • US12383791B2 patent drawing
  • US12383791B2 patent drawing
  • US12383791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are an athlete evaluation method and a system and device for performing the same. The athlete evaluation method may include acquiring location data of a plurality of participants, computing a reference location of a specific sport participant on the basis of location data of other sport participants, generating relative location data of the specific participant from the location data of the specific participant in consideration of the reference location, generating heatmap data of the specific participant on the basis of the relative location data, and computing a performance index of the specific participant.