Multi-sensor Object Detection with ML Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security systems struggle to accurately and efficiently monitor premises due to limitations in processing and interpreting image data from cameras, often leading to incorrect or delayed responses to potential security threats, such as package theft.

Innovation Solution

A multi-sensor system that combines image data from cameras with data from radar sensors and microphones, using machine-learning models to correlate and analyze sensor data to identify entities and execute appropriate actions, such as initiating a 'welcome home' routine or alerting authorities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If camera footage is captured and stored for later review, then evidence of security events is preserved, but the user cannot prevent harmful activities in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time to security threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of camera footage using machine learning models to identify potential security threats before they materialize into harmful events. By pre-processing and pre-alarming on detected entities and behaviors, the system enables users to take preventive actions in advance, resolving the contradiction between preserving evidence and enabling real-time prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If security systems automatically analyze video footage to detect threats, then real-time responses are enabled, but false actions may be taken due to low confidence in interpretation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity response speedVSAvoidaccuracy of threat detection
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where machine learning models continuously learn from user corrections and verification inputs. When users verify or correct entity classifications, this feedback is used to retrain and improve model accuracy over time, reducing false positives while maintaining fast automated response capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary verification mechanism where user input serves as a mediator between automated detection and final action execution. Users can verify detected entities before automated responses are triggered, creating a hybrid system that combines the speed of automation with the reliability of human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple sensors are integrated to improve detection accuracy, then entity identification reliability increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity identification accuracyVSAvoidmulti-sensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sensor types (camera, radar, microphone) into a unified multi-modal detection framework. By combining complementary information from different sensors and processing them through integrated machine learning models, the system achieves higher identification accuracy while managing complexity through unified architecture rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240296390A1Multi-source object detection
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 VIVINT LLC
  • US20240296390A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296390A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296390A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A security system can include a first sensor device that can collect first sensor data of an object in an environment, the first sensor data comprising image data. A second sensor device can collect second sensor data of the object. A determination is made, based on the first sensor data, a first correlation of the object to an entity category of a set of entity categories. Another determination is also made, based on the second sensor data, a second correlation of the object to the entity category. A designation can be made, based on the first correlation and the second correlation, that the object is an entity of the entity category. A determination can be made, based on the sensor data, one or more criteria of the entity. One or more actions can be executed based on the entity category and the one or more criteria.