Multi-Sensor Pest Trap Detection Using Gas and Non-Gas Signals
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing pest detection traps using electronic noses are costly due to complex hardware and require substantial research and development, and are not widely adopted due to high costs and complexity in fine-tuning VOC profiles for different local requirements.
Innovation Solution
A trap equipped with both gas sensors for detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and non-gas sensors for environmental parameters, combined with a data processing model like a neural network, to provide cost-effective and reliable pest detection and identification.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If electronic noses (gas sensors) are used for pest detection, then detection capability is improved, but hardware complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines gas sensors (electronic noses) with non-gas sensors (acoustic, optical, mechanical sensors) into an integrated pest detection system. This merging allows the system to use multiple sensing modalities, where non-gas sensors can detect pest presence through alternative mechanisms (sound, light, movement), thereby maintaining high detection capability while reducing dependence on complex gas sensor arrays alone.
Solution Approach 2:
The trap system is designed with multi-functional capabilities: gas sensors detect VOCs, non-gas sensors detect acoustic and optical signals, and the same trap structure serves both as a capture device and a monitoring platform. This universality allows a single system to perform multiple detection functions, reducing the need for separate specialized devices and lowering overall system complexity.
2Measurement precision
If electronic noses are used for pest identification, then identification accuracy is improved, but research and development cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses acoustic signals (sound waves) and optical signals as alternative 'copies' or proxies for chemical VOC detection. Instead of relying solely on complex electronic nose systems that require extensive training data and development, the system captures pest-related acoustic emissions and optical reflections, which can be processed with simpler algorithms and lower R&D investment while maintaining identification accuracy.
Solution Approach 2:
The system transitions from detecting chemical parameters (VOCs requiring complex spectrometry) to detecting physical parameters (acoustic frequency, optical intensity) that are easier and cheaper to measure. By changing the detection parameter from chemical composition to physical signals, the system achieves pest identification with reduced R&D costs and simpler manufacturing.
3Reliability
If VOC profiles are fine-tuned for different local requirements, then detection reliability is improved, but complexity in fine-tuning increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the detection system into modular components: gas sensing module, acoustic sensing module, optical sensing module, and data processing module. Each module can be independently configured and calibrated for local conditions. This segmentation allows flexible adaptation to different regional pest species and environmental conditions without requiring complete system re-tuning, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing fine-tuning complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The system employs dynamic adaptability where sensors and processing algorithms can adjust to local conditions in real-time. Acoustic and optical parameters can be dynamically calibrated based on environmental factors (temperature, humidity, background noise) without requiring complex pre-programming of VOC profiles for each location. This dynamic approach maintains detection reliability across different regions while simplifying the deployment process.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The combination of gas and non-gas sensors with a data processing model enhances detection reliability and reduces costs by leveraging independent sensor data, making the system less dependent on air composition changes and reducing the need for extensive research and development.
Implementation Method 1
one or more gas sensors arranged to register airborne substances released in the capture compartment
Implementation Method 2
one or more non-gas sensors arranged to register one or more environmental parameters in the capture compartment and/or in the one or more entrances
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
Figure 5~6
AI summary
A method (800) for installing a trap (100) for detecting one or more pests is provided. The method comprises placing (802) the trap (100) in a target location, scanning (804) a marker (132) provided on the trap (100) by using a reading device (314) of an operator apparatus (300), determining (806) trap identification data (302) based on trap reading data provided by the reading device (314) by using a data processing device (316) of the operator apparatus (300), uploading (808) the trap identification data (302) from the operator apparatus (300) to a server (200), and retrieving (810) trap specification data (312) comprising information about the one or more gas sensors (106) being used in the trap (100) and information about the one or more non-gas sensors (108) being used in the trap (100) in response to transferring the trap identification data (302) to a database (308).