Multi-Sensor UAV Identification for Airspace Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The anonymous nature of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) poses challenges in ensuring airspace safety and accountability in critical locations, as they can compromise the security of areas like airports, prisons, and residential homes, necessitating a system to detect, identify, and manage UAVs effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing video, audio, Wi-Fi, and radio frequency sensors to collect and process data to identify, track, and manage UAVs, employing confidence measures and pattern recognition to confirm UAV presence, and store information in a database for management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple sensors (video, audio, Wi-Fi, RF) are deployed to detect and identify UAVs, then the detection capability and identification accuracy improve, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUAV detection and identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor types (video, audio, Wi-Fi, RF) into an integrated sensor network system that collectively detects and identifies UAVs. Each sensor type targets different aspects of UAV presence, and their data is fused to achieve comprehensive identification accuracy while managing system complexity through unified architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor network is designed with multi-functional capabilities where each sensor can serve multiple purposes. For example, RF sensors detect both control signals and communication signals from UAVs, while video sensors provide both visual detection and identification functions, reducing the need for dedicated single-purpose sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If sensor data is processed locally at each sensor node, then response time improves, but the computational requirements and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system architecture segments processing tasks between edge devices and central servers. Simple detection and filtering operations are performed locally at sensor nodes for immediate response, while complex data fusion and analysis are offloaded to centralized servers, balancing response time requirements with energy consumption constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Local processing at sensor nodes performs only partial processing (basic detection and filtering) rather than complete data analysis. This allows the system to achieve timely response for critical detections while minimizing energy consumption by leaving more computationally intensive tasks for centralized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250279006A1Systems, methods, apparatuses, and devices for identifying, tracking, and managing unmanned aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 AXON ENTERPRISE INC
  • US20250279006A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279006A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279006A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatus for identifying and tracking UAVs including an image capturing device. A computing device can receive a frame captured via an image capturing device configured to monitor a particular air space. The computing device can identify a region of interest (ROI) in the frame. The ROI can include an image of an object. The computing device can perform a background subtraction process on the frame. The computing device can scale the frame to a uniform size. The computing device can perform a comparison of the frame to reference images. The reference images can include known unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images and known non-UAV images. The computing device can classify the object with a UAV classification based on the comparison.