Multi-Shield Capacitive Sensing Circuit for Accurate Proximity Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current capacitive touch sensing technologies face challenges in accurately detecting proximity at distant areas of mobile devices using a single sensing IC, as they struggle with maintaining shielding planes at the same voltage potential, leading to reduced accuracy and increased interference from RF and noise.

Innovation Solution

A capacitive touch controller with multiple sensing terminals and separate shielding terminals, which allows for independent voltage control of each shielding area, reducing the load on the sensing IC and minimizing interference between shielding areas, thereby enhancing accuracy and noise cancellation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single sensing IC is used to detect proximity at distant areas, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to maintain shielding planes at same voltage potential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sensing ICsVSAvoidproximity detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single sensing IC into multiple independent sensing terminals, each with its own shielding terminal. This segmentation allows each sensing area to have independent voltage control, maintaining measurement precision while reducing overall device complexity compared to using multiple separate ICs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension of control by providing separate shielding terminals for each sensing terminal. This dimensional expansion in the control architecture enables independent voltage management of shielding planes, resolving the precision-loss problem without requiring multiple ICs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If shielding planes are shared across multiple sensing areas, then device complexity is reduced, but harmful factors increase due to RF and noise interference between areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshielding structure complexityVSAvoidinterference between shielding areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the shared shielding structure into separate shielding terminals, each dedicated to a specific sensing area. This segmentation isolates RF and noise interference between areas while maintaining a unified shielding architecture, reducing harmful factors without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent provides shielding coverage for each sensing area independently through separate terminals, ensuring adequate shielding performance for each region without over-engineering the entire system. This partial action approach optimizes the balance between complexity and interference reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensing ICs are used to maintain shielding planes independently, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensing ICs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sensing functions into a single integrated sensing IC, while providing separate shielding terminals for each sensing area. This consolidation reduces device complexity and cost compared to using multiple ICs, while maintaining independent voltage control capability for precision measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single sensing IC is designed with multi-functionality, incorporating multiple sensing terminals and separate shielding terminals that can independently control voltage for each sensing area. This universal design achieves the precision of multiple ICs while maintaining the simplicity of a single device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If shielding areas are connected to a common terminal, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of energy increases due to reduced ability to maintain voltage potential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal connection structureVSAvoidenergy required to maintain shielding voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the common terminal connection into separate shielding terminals, each independently connected to its sensing area. This segmentation reduces the total load on each terminal, improving voltage maintenance capability and reducing energy loss while keeping the terminal structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent provides dedicated shielding terminals for each sensing area, ensuring adequate voltage maintenance for each region without over-provisioning the entire system. This partial action approach optimizes energy efficiency by matching shielding resources to actual sensing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables more accurate and reliable capacitive touch sensing across multiple areas of a mobile device, reducing the need for multiple sensing ICs and minimizing interference, thus improving the overall performance and reducing the physical and cost constraints of mobile device design.

Implementation Method 1

Proximity sensor 11 uses the self-capacitance of a sensing element to determine whether a user is in proximity. Self-capacitance of the sensing element changes as a user's body part moves nearby proximity sensor 11.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-capacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

Capacitive sensing elements often use shielding areas to reduce the sensitivity to noise. The shielding areas are driven by the sensing IC to approximately the same voltage potential as an associated sensing element when detecting proximity.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic shielding: Faraday Cage

Implementation Method 3

Touchscreen 12 utilizes resistance, capacitance, acoustic waves, an infrared grid, optical imaging, or other methods to determine the presence and location of a user's touch.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive touch sensing: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP3029553B1Multi-shield capacitive sensing circuit
Publication Date: 2019.04.10 SEMTECH CORP
  • EP3029553B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3029553B1 patent drawingFigure 1c
  • EP3029553B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b

AI summary

A proximity sensor includes a capacitive touch controller. A first shielding area is coupled to a first shield terminal of the capacitive touch controller. A second shield area is coupled to a second shield terminal of the capacitive touch controller. A first sensing element is disposed adjacent to the first shielding area. The first sensing element is coupled to a first sensing terminal of the capacitive touch controller. A second sensing element is disposed adjacent to the second shielding area. The second sensing element is coupled to a second sensing terminal of the capacitive touch controller. The capacitive touch controller is configured to associate the first sensing element with the first shielding area. A self-capacitance of the first sensing element is measured while the second shielding area is inactive. The self-capacitance of the first sensing element is measured at a first frequency.