Multi-Side Pouring Closure with Air Duct for Spout

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pouring closures for canisters allow only single-point pouring, leading to irregular flow, spills, and difficulties in maintaining controlled pouring due to uneven air flow and weight challenges, especially when tilting the canister.

Innovation Solution

A pouring closure with a double-walled pipe structure that extends around at least 90° of the circumference, incorporating an air duct that opens on both sides of the pouring window, ensuring consistent air flow and pressure equalization for controlled multi-sided pouring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional single-point pouring closure is used, then the structure is simple, but the pouring flow becomes irregular and spills occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepouring controlVSAvoidclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pouring closure is segmented into multiple independent pouring openings distributed around the circumference of the pipe, rather than a single pouring point. This segmentation allows the liquid flow to be controlled from multiple locations, preventing irregular flow patterns and spills while maintaining reliable pouring control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-point (0D/1D) pouring closure to a multi-point circumferential pouring system (2D/3D). By distributing pouring openings around the circumference of the pipe, the system adds spatial dimensionality to the pouring control, enabling consistent flow regulation regardless of canister tilt angle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the canister is tilted for pouring, then the liquid can flow out, but air flow becomes uneven and causes surges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepouring flowVSAvoidflow consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The air inlet opening is segmented into multiple smaller openings distributed around the circumference of the pipe, matching the distribution of pouring openings. This segmentation ensures that air can enter uniformly from multiple locations, maintaining consistent pressure balance and preventing surges during pouring regardless of canister tilt.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the pipe are assigned different functions: the front half circumference contains pouring openings for liquid discharge, while the rear half circumference contains air inlet openings for ventilation. This local quality differentiation ensures optimal air flow distribution and pressure equalization throughout the pouring process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Length of moving object

If the pouring spout is positioned close to the filler neck, then the pouring distance is reduced, but the pouring angle is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepouring distanceVSAvoidpouring direction
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The circumferential distribution of pouring openings makes the closure system universal and adaptable to multiple pouring directions. Rather than being limited to a single pouring angle, the system can pour from any of the multiple circumferential positions, enabling the canister to be positioned closer to the filler neck while maintaining versatile pouring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables controlled pouring over a wide range of the circumference, preventing surges and spills by maintaining consistent air flow and pressure, allowing for smooth, uniform liquid discharge without dripping.

Implementation Method 1

ensuring a steady flow of air into the canister or container, with the volume of liquid outflowing the amount of air inflowing to equalize and maintain internal pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3164338B1Pouring closure for the spout of a canister or any container for controlled multi-side pouring
Publication Date: 2020.11.11 CAPARTIS
  • EP3164338B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3164338B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3164338B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

This pouring closure permits controlled multi-side pouring by means of a canister spout. The pouring closure consists of a spout attachment (2), which forms a channel (14), which is reduced in size with respect to the spout and an upper outer edge of which forms a protruding drop lip (11). A closure cover (1), which acts as a jet former, forms a pipe (4), which extends downward and which fits into a channel (14) on the spout attachment (2) in a sealing manner. The pipe (4) extending downward has a lateral window (5), which extends at least around 90° of the pipe circumference. The remaining pipe circumference is doubled-walled. The interior thus formed leads toward the outside in the axial direction at the lower end of the pipe (4) as an air channel (7), and the air channel (7) likewise leads toward the outside only in the upper region of the window (5) laterally on both sides of the window. Thus, pouring can occur over each point of the drop lip (11) with a jet that always remains constant and with sufficient pressure equalization in the canister during the entire pouring process.