Automated Multi-Signature Decoy Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for validating the proper release of multi-signature decoys are tedious, subjective, and labor-intensive, requiring manual image analysis to identify release points and infrared signatures.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous and fully automated method using image capturing devices and processors to capture and process raw image data, identifying release points and infrared signatures, and generating a visual display for quality assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual validating methods are used with operators placing ROI objects to enclose signatures, then the process can be performed with existing simple equipment, but the process becomes tedious, subjective, and labor intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by implementing automatic signature detection and validation algorithms that autonomously identify decoy segments and their release points without requiring manual operator intervention. The processor automatically analyzes captured images, detects infrared signatures, determines release points, and generates validation reports, allowing the system to validate its own performance objectively and efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual image analysis is performed to identify release points and infrared signatures, then equipment requirements remain simple, but the process becomes subjective and labor intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignature identification accuracyVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical manual analysis process with an automated computational system. Instead of operators manually examining images and placing ROI objects, the processor automatically detects infrared signatures, identifies release points, and validates decoy performance using image processing algorithms and pattern recognition techniques, eliminating subjectivity and significantly reducing validation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the number of captured frames and signatures to be analyzed increases, then more comprehensive validation data is obtained, but the labor intensity and time required increase proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation completenessVSAvoidanalysis throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic processing capabilities that can adapt to varying numbers of captured frames and signatures. The automated algorithm efficiently processes any quantity of image data by dynamically adjusting analysis parameters and processing throughput, maintaining consistent validation quality whether analyzing a few frames or large datasets without proportional increases in time or labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10970852B2Systems and methods for multi-signature countermeasure testing
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 ALLOY SURFACES CO INC
  • US10970852B2 patent drawing
  • US10970852B2 patent drawing
  • US10970852B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media are provided for an autonomous and fully automated method of validating multi-signature decoys that are configured to release infrared flares at multiple points after launch. In one aspect, a method includes capturing, using at least one image capturing device, raw image data of a launched decoy, the decoy having one or more segments configured to be released after launch and automatically processing the raw image data to (1) identify a release point for each of the one or more segments and (2) identify an infrared signature associated with each release point. The method further includes generating a visual display of the release point(s) of the one or more segments and the infrared signature(s) originating from the release point(s).