Multi-source Data Assimilation for Environmental Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data assimilation methods face challenges in combining data from multiple sources with varying coverages, accuracies, and resolutions in environmental monitoring, leading to high computational costs and low precision.

Innovation Solution

A method for data assimilation that involves obtaining high-quality data from one region and calibrating lower-quality data from another region based on their relationship in an overlap area, using a fitted curve to unify metrics and units, and extrapolating to create a comprehensive data set with improved accuracy and resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If ground station data is used for environmental monitoring, then measurement precision is improved, but area of coverage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidcoverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources (ground stations, ground sensors, laser radars, and satellites) into a unified data assimilation system. By merging these diverse sources with varying coverages and accuracies, the system achieves both high measurement precision from ground stations and large coverage area from satellites and sensors simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Area of stationary object

If conventional data assimilation methods are used to combine multiple data sources, then coverage is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the data assimilation process by changing parameters through calibration. It calibrates lower-quality data to match higher-quality data characteristics, and performs extrapolation to extend coverage. This parameter-based approach reduces computational complexity compared to conventional methods while maintaining improved coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If conventional data assimilation methods are used to combine multiple data sources, then coverage is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoiddata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes through calibration processes that adjust lower-quality data to align with higher-quality data characteristics. By calibrating ground sensor data against ground station data and laser radar data against satellite data, the system maintains measurement precision while extending coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses calibration relationships as intermediary mechanisms between different data sources. These calibration functions act as mediators that transfer accuracy characteristics from high-quality data to low-quality data, enabling extended coverage without sacrificing measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10627380B2Multi-source data assimilation for three-dimensional environmental monitoring
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10627380B2 patent drawing
  • US10627380B2 patent drawing
  • US10627380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure involves multi-source data assimilation. According to an embodiment, first data associated with an indication of environmental quality in a first region is obtained, and second data associated with an indication of environmental quality in a second region is obtained. The first data is of a higher quality than the second data according to a predetermined criterion. The second data is calibrated according to a relationship between the first and second data in an overlap of the first and second regions. Third data associated with an indication of environmental quality in a third region is determined based on the first data and the calibrated second data, wherein the third region comprises at least the first and second regions.