Multi-Sprocket Carrier Structure for Low-Weight Wide-Range Cassettes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multiple sprocket assemblies for bicycles with increased numbers of sprockets face challenges in being lightweight, stable, and cost-effective, while also accommodating standard driver dimensions and maintaining axial width constraints.

Innovation Solution

A sprocket carrier designed with uniformly thick aluminum sheet metal, stamped and bent to create multiple stages and arms, providing stability and torque transmission while maintaining low weight through strategically varied material thickness and openings, allowing for the attachment of multiple large sprockets with different numbers of teeth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of sprockets is increased to provide more gear ratios, then the versatility of the bicycle drive is improved, but the axial width and weight of the multiple sprocket assembly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear ratio optionsVSAvoidaxial width
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sprockets are arranged in multiple axial levels on the carrier instead of a single plane, utilizing the axial dimension to pack more sprockets within the radial space constraints. This allows 11-14 sprockets to be mounted on a standard driver without excessive axial width increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sprockets are nested on the same carrier arms at different axial positions, with smaller sprockets positioned axially outside and larger sprockets positioned axially inside, maximizing space utilization and reducing overall axial width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of sprockets and their size are increased, then the gear ratio range is improved, but the weight of the multiple sprocket assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear ratio rangeVSAvoidassembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier arms have non-uniform cross-sections with varying wall thicknesses and reinforcement patterns optimized for the specific load requirements of each arm, reducing material usage while maintaining strength. Larger sprockets are supported by thicker-reinforced arms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier is segmented into multiple independent arms that can be optimized individually, allowing material to be concentrated where needed (under large sprockets) and reduced where loads are lighter, minimizing overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional sprocket carriers are used to attach multiple large sprockets, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the stability and strength under chain forces deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidresistance to chain forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier arms feature localized reinforcement at critical stress points including rivet attachment areas and under large sprockets, with varying wall thicknesses that provide maximum strength where chain forces are highest while maintaining manufacturability through stamping processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier is constructed from aluminum alloy sheet material that combines formability with adequate strength, utilizing the material's inherent properties and strategic thickness variations to achieve both ease of manufacture and resistance to chain forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Stability of the object's composition

If the material thickness of the carrier is increased to improve stability, then the stability is improved, but the weight and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier stabilityVSAvoidcarrier weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier employs non-uniform material thickness with strategic variations: thicker sections (3-5mm) at critical load-bearing areas such as rivet attachment zones and under large sprockets, and thinner sections (1-3mm) in low-stress areas, achieving maximum stability with minimum weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier is divided into multiple arms with independently optimized thickness profiles, allowing each arm to have the minimum necessary material for its specific load requirements rather than uniformly thick construction throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3450297B1Chain wheel holder and multiple chain wheel assembly
Publication Date: 2021.06.09 SRAM
  • EP3450297B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3450297B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3450297B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

The invention relates to a sprocket carrier for use in a multi-sprocket arrangement and for rotatable mounting on a rear wheel axle. The sprocket carrier has a substantially uniform material thickness. Furthermore, the sprocket carrier is designed such that at least three large sprockets can be attached to the carrier.