Multi-Stage Back Pressure Regulator Cavitation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional back pressure regulators face issues with cavitation and excessive noise due to high pressure differentials, which can lead to valve erosion and require additional noise suppression systems, and internal components can work against each other, causing unstable pressure regulation.

Innovation Solution

The development of multi-stage back pressure regulators with a gas-charged first stage and a spring-biased second stage, configured in an 'over-then-under' and 'under-then-over' fluid flow path respectively, which maintains a constant inlet pressure and eliminates cavitation by using an internal pressure reference independent of external water pressure, and reduces noise by extending the allowable pressure differential across internal regulators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If a conventional single-stage back pressure regulator is used to handle large pressure differentials, then the device can operate with high pressure drop, but cavitation occurs causing valve erosion and excessive noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure differentialVSAvoidcavitation and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The regulator is divided into multiple stages, where each stage handles a portion of the total pressure differential. The first stage reduces pressure by a controlled amount, and subsequent stages further reduce pressure to the final outlet pressure. This segmentation prevents any single stage from experiencing the full pressure differential that would cause cavitation and noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediate chamber is introduced between the inlet and outlet of the regulator. This intermediate chamber serves as a mediator that receives fluid at high pressure from the inlet, reduces it to an intermediate pressure level, and then delivers it to the second stage for further pressure reduction to the outlet. This intermediate pressure zone prevents direct exposure to the full pressure differential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional back pressure regulators are designed with internal components to govern pressure drop, then pressure regulation can be achieved, but internal components work against each other causing unstable regulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulation stabilityVSAvoidinternal component interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure regulation function is segmented across multiple independent stages. Each stage has its own pressure governing mechanism that operates independently on a portion of the total pressure drop. This segmentation eliminates the conflicting interactions that occur in single-stage designs where multiple components must work together to manage the full pressure differential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If noise suppression systems are added to meet safety standards, then noise can be reduced, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-stage pressure reduction design converts what would otherwise be a harmful high-velocity single-stage pressure drop into a series of controlled, lower-velocity pressure reductions. By distributing the pressure drop across multiple stages, the design inherently reduces noise generation at each stage, eliminating the need for additional noise suppression systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively operates under large pressure differentials without cavitation, reduces noise emissions, and eliminates siphoning effects, allowing for stable fluid delivery in deep water applications without the need for external noise suppression systems or additional pressure references.

Implementation Method 1

a gas-charged first stage and a spring-biased second stage, configured in an 'over-then-under' and 'under-then-over' fluid flow path respectively, which maintains a constant inlet pressure and eliminates cavitation by using an internal pressure reference independent of external water pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure:

Implementation Method 2

a spring-biased second stage, configured in an 'under-then-over' fluid flow path respectively, which maintains a constant inlet pressure and eliminates cavitation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 3

Cavitation conditions occur when fluid velocities are fast enough to cause the pressure at the velocity point to drop below the vapor pressure of the liquid. When pressure in the liquid drops below the liquid vapor pressure it creates a collapsing bubble

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation prevention: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentUS9798331B2Multi-stage back pressure regulators and associated devices, systems, and methods
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 SKO FLO INDUSTIRES
  • US9798331B2 patent drawing
  • US9798331B2 patent drawing
  • US9798331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Multi-stage back pressure regulators are disclosed herein. In one embodiment, a multi-stage back pressure regulator includes a first stage and a second stage downstream from the first stage. The first stage includes a gas-charged regulator device arranged to receive a fluid at an inlet, and the second stage includes a spring-loaded regulator device having an outlet in fluid communication with the inlet. The gas-charged regulator and the spring-loaded regulator are configured to control inlet pressure to the back pressure regulator and maximum differential pressures across the first and second stages.