ML-Based Multi-Stage Code Generation with Automated Validity Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer code generation and testing systems are inefficient, leading to increased computational resource consumption and reduced system efficiency due to the generation of low-quality code, which is challenging to detect timely.

Innovation Solution

An ML-based system generates and validates computer code solutions by creating test cases and evaluating them against validity conditions, reducing computational resources and improving system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated code generation systems generate code without rigorous validation, then code generation speed is improved, but code quality and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode generation speedVSAvoidcode quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by generating test cases and validity conditions before final code acceptance. The ML model creates test cases that execute the generated code to verify correctness, and generates validity conditions that check code properties before deployment, preventing defective code from reaching production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where test case results and validity condition evaluations are fed back to the code generation process. When code fails validation, the system uses this feedback to iteratively refine and correct the generated code, ensuring continuous improvement of code quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive test cases are generated to validate code quality, then code reliability is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode qualityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial validation by generating a strategically selected subset of test cases rather than exhaustive testing. The ML model identifies critical test cases that provide maximum validation coverage with minimum computational overhead, avoiding unnecessary testing of already-validated code paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts validation parameters such as test case depth, number of test scenarios, and validation strictness based on code complexity and risk assessment. For simple, low-risk code, fewer test cases are generated, while complex, high-risk code receives more comprehensive validation, optimizing resource allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple validation stages are implemented to ensure code correctness, then code reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode validation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is segmented into distinct modular components: test case generation module, code execution module, validity condition generation module, and result analysis module. Each module performs a specific validation function independently, making the complex validation process manageable, maintainable, and configurable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250245125A1Automated multi-stage computer code generation
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 ROPES AI INC
  • US20250245125A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245125A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technical solutions are directed to creation and deployment of multi-stage test problems. A processor can provide, to a client, a first data structure for a first stage of a multi-stage test problem including a description for generation of a client solution for the first stage and a test case to evaluate the client solution. The processor can receive, from the client, a client data structure comprising the client solution including a client computer code generated at the client for the first stage. The processor can determine, by evaluating the client solution using an input value and an output value of the test case, that the output of the client solution satisfies a validity condition of the output value. The processor can provide, to the client, based on satisfying the validity condition, a second data structures for a second stage of the multi-stage test problem.