Multi-Stage Comminutor and Juice Extractor for High Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing juice extraction methods face a trade-off between maximizing juice yield and minimizing extraction time, as over-maceration can lead to machine clogging and under-maceration results in lower juice extraction efficiency, with prior methods struggling to balance these parameters effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves successively reducing food mass pieces into smaller sizes using multiple comminutors and juice extractors, with each reduction step followed by a pressing phase, allowing for increased surface area exposure and efficient juice extraction while minimizing processing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the food mass is macerated into smaller pieces prior to juice pressing, then the percentage of juice extracted increases, but the machine becomes clogged resulting in increased downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepercentage of juice extractedVSAvoidmachine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single maceration and pressing operation into multiple sequential stages. Food mass is macerated in progressive steps (coarse to fine) across multiple comminutors, with pressing operations interspersed between maceration stages. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high juice extraction (90% or more) while preventing clogging by managing particle size progression systematically rather than all at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary maceration in controlled stages before final pressing operations. Each comminutor stage prepares the food mass to an optimal size for the subsequent pressing operation, ensuring that by the time material reaches the pressing stage, it is properly sized for efficient juice extraction without causing clogging issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If the food solids are made too small, then more juice can be extracted, but it becomes more difficult to separate the solids from the juice

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejuice extractedVSAvoidseparation of juice from solids
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the maceration process into multiple controlled stages with pressing operations between them. This prevents the formation of excessively fine particles that would be difficult to separate, while still achieving high juice extraction by progressively breaking down cell structures across multiple pressing cycles rather than relying on extreme fine maceration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the food mass is not macerated sufficiently, then machine clogging is reduced, but less juice is extracted due to failure to break open plant cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine operation continuityVSAvoidjuice extracted
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple maceration stages with pressing operations between them. This ensures sufficient cell breakage for high juice extraction (90% or more) while maintaining reliable continuous operation by preventing clogging through controlled particle size progression across stages rather than excessive maceration in a single stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous productive operation by interspersing pressing operations between maceration stages. Rather than stopping for clogging issues, the system continuously progresses material through the multi-stage process, with each stage contributing to juice extraction while maintaining operational flow and preventing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves a high juice yield of 90% or higher in approximately five minutes by progressively chopping and pressing the food mass, reducing the risk of machine clogging and ensuring efficient separation of juice from solids.

Implementation Method 1

The coarse food pieces are pressed with extracted juice falling into the collection tray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The tray of first juice extractor is retracted allowing the pressed coarse chop food pieces to fall into the hopper of a second comminutor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10701958B2Apparatus for multi-stage cutting and juice pressing
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 GOODNATURE PRODUCTS INC
  • US10701958B2 patent drawing
  • US10701958B2 patent drawing
  • US10701958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Juice extraction using multiple pairs of juice extractors and comminutors which reduce the food pieces into successively smaller pieces with juice extraction occurring after each comminuting step. Coarse food pieces are pressed with extracted juice directed to a juice holding tank. The pressed coarse chop food pieces fall into the hopper of a second comminutor which performs a medium chop on the now pressed but still coarse chopped food pieces. The medium chopped food pieces are then fed from the second comminutor into the juice extraction chamber of a second juice extractor whereupon the medium chopped food pieces are pressed with extracted juice directed to a juice holding tank. Any number of comminutor and juice extraction pairs may be used in serial fashion to optimize the percentage of juice extracted in a minimum amount of time.