Multi-Stage Article Security Inspection Using CT and XRD

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security inspection systems for passenger luggage items have high misdetermination rates and low efficiency, leading to unnecessary manual inspections and reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layered security inspection system involving multiple detection devices and determination devices, including CT and XRD systems, to provide secondary checks on items with initial non-safe results, and manual inspection for items with final non-safe results, improving accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single detection device is used for security inspection, then the inspection process is simple and fast, but the misdetermination rate is high and accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system is segmented into multiple independent detection devices (first detection device, second detection device) that perform sequential inspections. Each device focuses on specific detection tasks, with the first device performing initial screening and the second device performing verification on items flagged as non-safe, thereby improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to the inspection process by implementing multi-stage detection. Items that fail the first detection stage are subjected to a second detection stage, creating a layered inspection approach that transforms a single-point detection into a multi-point verification process, significantly reducing misdetermination rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple detection devices are used to improve accuracy, then the misdetermination rate decreases, but the inspection efficiency and throughput are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection reliabilityVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The second detection device is selectively applied only to items that are determined as non-safe by the first detection device, rather than all items passing through both devices. This localized application of enhanced detection ensures high reliability for suspicious items while maintaining high throughput for the majority of safe items that are cleared by the first device alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial verification by applying the second detection device only when necessary (for non-safe items from the first detection), rather than performing full verification on all items. This partial action approach achieves sufficient reliability for security purposes while preserving inspection efficiency and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If manual inspection is performed on all non-safe items, then the accuracy is high, but the inspection time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The second detection device serves as an intermediary between the first detection device and manual inspection. It automatically verifies suspicious items, providing a deterministic result for many cases that would otherwise require manual inspection, thereby reducing both inspection time and resource consumption while maintaining high accuracy through automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces misdetermination rates and increases the efficiency of security inspections by providing multiple layers of detection and manual verification, ensuring accurate identification of potentially dangerous items.

Implementation Method 1

the first detection result includes X-ray transmission data of the item

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray transmission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

the second detection result includes X-ray diffraction data of the item

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentEP4628882A1Article security inspection system and method
Publication Date: 2025.10.08 NUCTECH CO LTD
  • EP4628882A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4628882A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4628882A1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

An item security inspection system and method applicable in the technical field of security inspection are provided. The item security inspection system (100, 200, 300) includes: at least one first detection device (101) configured to detect an item (111) and generate a first detection result; a first determination device (102) configured to generate a first determination result including a first safe result and a first non-safe result according to the first detection result; at least one second detection device (103) configured to detect an item (111) of which the first determination result is the first non-safe result and generate a second detection result; a second determination device (104) configured to generate a second determination result comprising a second safe result and a second non-safe result based on at least the second detection result; and a manual security inspection section (105) configured to perform manual security inspection on at least an item (111) of which the second determination result is the second non-safe result.