Multi-Stage Energy Attenuator for Vehicle Seating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current seating systems in vehicles, watercraft, and aircraft fail to adequately mitigate the severity of shock loads experienced by occupants during high-energy impact events, such as explosions or crashes, as they lack effective energy attenuation mechanisms to control and modulate the inertia-induced motion of seats.

Innovation Solution

An energy attenuating seating system is introduced, comprising a seat guide apparatus that allows the seat to move vertically and energy attenuating components that support the seat under normal conditions and absorb energy through controlled deformation during impact events, utilizing a multi-stage attenuation process with customizable materials and configurations to manage seat motion and load distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional seating systems are used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but they fail to adequately mitigate shock loads during high-energy impact events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock load mitigation capabilityVSAvoidseating system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The energy attenuating component is divided into multiple attenuation zones with different cross-sectional areas, creating a multi-stage attenuation process. Each zone handles different levels of energy absorption, allowing the system to effectively mitigate shock loads while maintaining a manageable structural complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent varies the cross-sectional area parameters of different attenuation zones to optimize energy absorption. By changing geometric parameters (cross-sectional areas) of metal members, the system achieves improved shock load mitigation capability while keeping the overall structure practical for manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If energy attenuating components with multiple attenuation zones are used, then energy absorption capability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidcomponent fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Different attenuation zones have different cross-sectional areas tailored to their specific energy absorption requirements. This local quality approach allows each zone to be optimized for its function while maintaining compatibility with standard manufacturing processes, balancing energy absorption capability with ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The energy attenuating component uses metal members with varying cross-sectional areas that can be fabricated using conventional processes. The design allows for composite construction approaches where different zones may use different materials or fabrication methods appropriate to their specific requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the seat is constrained to prevent motion, then occupant position is controlled, but shock load severity is not reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock load attenuationVSAvoidseat position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The seat guide apparatus provides dynamic guidance that allows controlled seat motion during impact events while maintaining stability during normal operation. The system transitions from a static constrained position to a dynamic energy-absorbing motion, then returns to stable positioning, achieving both shock load attenuation and position control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The energy attenuating component acts as an intermediary between the seat and the vehicle structure. It mediates the interaction by allowing controlled motion to absorb energy while the seat guide apparatus ensures the seat returns to its proper position, balancing attenuation and stability requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the severity of shock loads by absorbing energy through controlled deformation of metal components, ensuring occupant safety by managing seat motion and load distribution, capable of withstanding high-energy impacts like mine blasts and road shocks, while maintaining structural integrity and preventing excessive binding during such events.

Implementation Method 1

energy attenuating components that support the seat under normal conditions and absorb energy through controlled deformation during impact events

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through controlled deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

control and modulate the inertia-induced motion of seats

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia-induced motion: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS10052984B1Extended stroke energy attenuator
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 ARMORWORKS ENTERPRISES INC
  • US10052984B1 patent drawing
  • US10052984B1 patent drawing
  • US10052984B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are provided for an energy attenuating vehicle seating system that includes a seat configured for guided motion relative to a vehicle compartment over a stroking distance, and an energy attenuating component with a first end attached to the seat, a second end configured for attachment to the vehicle compartment, and an intermediate point configured for guided motion relative to the vehicle compartment. The energy attenuating component is configured to remain rigid and prevent the seat from moving under loads less than a predetermined threshold value, yet deform in a progressive, predictable manner in response to a load exceeding the threshold.