Multi-Stage Gasification Process for Complete Tar Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gasification processes face challenges in completely removing tar from pyrolysis gas, leading to reactor clogging and inefficiencies in producing clean syngas for internal combustion engines.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage gasification process that includes a drying phase, pyrolysis, separation of pyrolysis gas and carbonaceous residue, thermochemical treatment of pyrolysis gas, and passage through a reducing bed composed of the carbonaceous residue, ensuring complete tar removal and syngas production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-stage gasification process is used, then the process is simpler and more compact, but tar removal is incomplete leading to reactor clogging and reduced syngas quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidtar removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The gasification process is divided into three distinct stages occurring in separate zones within the reactor: (1) pyrolysis zone where biomass decomposes into syngas and tar, (2) oxidation zone where partial combustion occurs to generate heat and crack tar, and (3) reduction zone where remaining tar is converted to syngas. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally, ensuring complete tar removal while maintaining process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If downdraft reactor design is used, then tar cracking is improved through high temperature oxidation zone, but the reactor requires precise control of gasifying agent flow and negative pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetar cracking efficiencyVSAvoidprocess control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is designed with spatially differentiated zones having distinct temperature profiles, oxygen concentrations, and reaction characteristics. The oxidation zone maintains high temperature and oxygen presence for tar cracking, while the reduction zone provides lower temperature and oxygen-deficient conditions for tar conversion. This local quality differentiation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally without requiring complex overall control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The gasifying agent flow rate and negative pressure are automatically self-regulated by the reactor system based on the combustion and gasification reactions occurring within. The exothermic oxidation reactions naturally generate the heat and pressure gradients needed to drive gas flow through the reactor zones, reducing the need for external control mechanisms and simplifying operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If steam is extracted during drying phase and used as additional gasifying agent, then moisture utilization is improved and energy efficiency increases, but the system requires additional ducts and superheating infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The moisture present in the biomass, which traditionally represents an energy penalty requiring removal, is converted into a beneficial resource. Steam extracted during the drying phase is superheated and injected into the reduction zone as a gasifying agent, where it participates in water-gas shift reactions to produce additional syngas. This transforms the harmful effect of moisture into a useful function, improving overall energy efficiency while utilizing infrastructure already present in the reactor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a significant reduction in tar content, allowing for the production of high-quality syngas that can be directly used in internal combustion engines without clogging issues, and enables the use of biomass with high moisture content without size limitations.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the dry organic material to pyrolysis and generating a pyrolysis gas and a carbonaceous solid residue from the dry organic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the pyrolysis gas to a first combustion with a gasifying agent under sub-stoichiometric conditions by using ejecting nozzles arranged below and upstream of the reducing bed, and obtaining the cracking of the tar fraction contained in the pyrolysis gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

C+H2O→CO+H2 (Carbon Reforming)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbon Reforming:

Implementation Method 4

CO+H2O(g)→CO2+H2 (Water/Gas Shift Reaction)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater/Gas Shift Reaction:

Data Source

PatentUS12312545B2Process for gasifying an organic material and plant for carrying out said process
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 ERS ENG SRL
  • US12312545B2 patent drawing
  • US12312545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Process for gasifying an organic material, comprising the following steps: subjecting an organic material to a drying phase to reduce its humidity content and obtain dry organic material and steam, and extracting said steam; subjecting the dry organic material to pyrolysis and generating a pyrolysis gas and a carbonaceous solid residue from the dry organic material, the pyrolysis gas containing a tar fraction; separating the pyrolysis gas from the carbonaceous solid residue, wherein separating the pyrolysis gas comprises extracting the pyrolysis gas and conveying it separately from the carbonaceous solid residue generated by the pyrolysis; subjecting the pyrolysis gas to a thermochemical treatment; and, after the thermochemical treatment, causing the treated pyrolysis gas to penetrate through a reducing bed (31) composed of the carbonaceous solid residue generated by the pyrolysis, and producing a synthesis gas. Subjecting the pyrolysis gas to a thermochemical treatment comprises: subjecting the pyrolysis gas to a first combustion with a gasifying agent under sub-stoichiometric conditions by using ejecting nozzles (25) arranged below and upstream of the reducing bed (31), and obtaining the cracking of the tar fraction contained in the pyrolysis gas; and subjecting the pyrolysis gas to a second combustion introducing an additional gasifying agent in a chamber (20″) arranged above and downstream of the ejecting nozzles (25) and upstream of an interface (23) separating the chamber (20″) from the reducing bed (31), and completing the combustion of the tar fraction until the pyrolysis gas is fully converted to CO2, H2O(g) and heat.