Multi-Stage Hinge with Guide Slides and Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hinges lack a multi-stage opening action, limiting their functionality and flexibility in applications such as furniture and doors, where a more nuanced control over pivoting angles is desired.

Innovation Solution

A hinge design featuring two arms with guide and control slides, a cylinder-piston unit, and a torsion element, allowing for a multi-stage opening action by delaying the closing movement and enabling further opening beyond a standard operating end position through a combination of sliding and rotational mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional hinge design is used, then the structure is simple, but the pivoting angle control is limited and cannot achieve multi-stage opening action

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-stage opening actionVSAvoidhinge structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge is divided into multiple functional components: guide slides (first and second), control slides (first and second), a cylinder-piston unit, and a torsion element. Each component performs a specific function in controlling the pivoting motion through different stages, enabling the multi-stage opening action while managing complexity through functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge employs dynamic coupling mechanisms where the second guide slide can be rotationally fixedly coupled to either the second arm or the first arm depending on the pivoting angle sub-range. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the hinge to transition between different operational modes (normal closing vs. emergency opening) and achieve multi-stage motion control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the hinge is designed to allow further opening beyond the operating end position, then the flexibility is improved, but the control mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveopening range flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control slides act as intermediary elements between the guide slides and the arms. When the hinge needs to open beyond the operating end position, the control slides engage with the guide slides to transfer and control the relative movement, enabling the emergency opening function while isolating the complexity of the control mechanism from the main hinge structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The cylinder-piston unit and torsion element are pre-configured to provide controlled resistance and damping forces. The torsion element is arranged to delay the pivoting movement in specific angle sub-ranges, and the cylinder-piston unit provides linear damping, allowing the hinge to smoothly transition through different opening stages without requiring complex real-time control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the closing movement is delayed using a linear damper, then the stability is improved, but the closing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure stabilityVSAvoidclosing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The damping action is applied partially rather than continuously throughout the entire closing motion. The torsion element delays the pivoting movement only in specific angle sub-ranges bordering the initial position, while the cylinder-piston unit provides linear damping in other phases. This partial application of damping achieves closure stability without unnecessarily extending the total closing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a stable multi-stage opening and closing mechanism, providing enhanced control over pivoting angles and stability, allowing the hinge to be opened further than standard hinges, and ensuring secure closure with delayed damping.

Implementation Method 1

at least one cylinder-piston unit can be loaded by means of the second guide slide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic damping: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 2

The return movement can, for example, be supported at least in some areas by means of a torsion element arranged between the arms, wherein such torsion element delays the pivoting movement in an additional pivoting sub-range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11391077B2Hinge with multi-stage opening action
Publication Date: 2022.07.19 ZIMMER MARTIN
  • US11391077B2 patent drawing
  • US11391077B2 patent drawing
  • US11391077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hinge has two arms that can be pivoted relative to one another between a closed initial position and a second position. A first arm has a first guide slide. A second guide slide can be shifted along the pivot axis and can contact the first guide slide. When the two arms are moved towards the initial position, at least one cylinder-piston unit can be loaded by means of the second guide slide. The second guide slide can be rotationally fixedly coupled to the second arm in a first pivoting angle sub-range bordering the initial position and to the first arm in a second pivoting angle sub-range bordering the second position. The hinge has a first control slide rigidly connected to the second arm and a second control slide that makes contact with the first control slide and that is coupled against rotation to the first guide slide.