Multi-stage Image Matching Using Hybrid Search Templates
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Image recognition systems face inaccuracies and unreliability when matching low-quality images with a limited number of distinctive feature points, often resulting in false positives or missed matches due to distorted or partial representations.
Innovation Solution
An iterative multi-stage image matching procedure is employed, where a search image is compared to reference images to generate a hybrid search template, which is then used in subsequent stages to increase the number of feature points for more accurate matching, reducing false negatives and improving sensitivity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Speed
If distinctive feature points are used as the basis for matching operations, then matching speed is improved, but matching accuracy deteriorates when the search image has low quality and limited feature points
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by generating multiple candidate match sets using different feature point selection strategies before final matching. This includes generating candidate sets with minimum feature points, maximum feature points, and hybrid combinations, then evaluating them to determine the most accurate match rather than relying on a single feature point selection approach
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the number and selection of feature points used in matching operations. It evaluates multiple candidate match sets with varying feature point counts and selects the optimal set based on evaluation criteria, allowing the system to adapt feature point parameters to image quality conditions
2Loss of time
If a small number of distinctive feature points are used in matching operations, then processing time is reduced, but false positive match candidates increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system applies partial action by using only the necessary number of feature points required for accurate matching rather than always using all available feature points. It generates candidate match sets with varying feature point counts and selects the optimal subset, avoiding unnecessary processing while maintaining reliability
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback by evaluating multiple candidate match sets and using the evaluation results to determine the final matching outcome. The evaluation process provides feedback on the quality of each candidate set, allowing the system to iteratively refine its selection and reduce false positives
3Adaptability or versatility
If distinctive features are extracted from distorted or partial search images, then matching operations can proceed with limited image quality, but matching accuracy deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the matching process into multiple independent stages: feature point extraction, candidate match set generation, evaluation, and final selection. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, enabling the system to handle distorted or partial images effectively while maintaining accuracy through systematic processing
Solution Approach 2:
The system uses composite approaches by combining multiple candidate match sets with different feature point selections into a comprehensive evaluation process. It synthesizes results from various candidate sets (minimum feature points, maximum feature points, hybrid combinations) to produce a more reliable final matching decision
Data Source
AI summary
In some implementations, an image recognition system is capable of using an iterative multi-stage image matching procedure to improve the accuracy and/or reliability of matching a search image with a small number of distinctive feature points to reference images. In the first stage, the system compares a search template for the search image to reference templates of each image within the set of reference images. The system determines a best-matched reference image from among the reference images of the set of reference images. In the second stage, the system compares the hybrid search template to one or more reference templates of reference images that is not the best-matched reference image. The comparison can be used to either compute match scores for reference images corresponding to the one or more reference templates.