Multi-Stage Mixer Swirl Flow for Exhaust Reductant Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aftertreatment systems for internal combustion engines face challenges in providing a uniform flow of exhaust gases and reductant to catalysts, leading to inefficiencies and deposit formation, and are difficult to scale for varying engine ratings and operating conditions due to complex and costly components.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage mixer with symmetrical flow devices that create a swirl flow to uniformly distribute reductant within exhaust gases, reducing pressure drop and minimizing deposit formation, while being scalable and cost-effective by using a Venturi body and apertures to enhance mixing and distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional aftertreatment systems use complex components to provide uniform flow of exhaust gases and reductant, then catalyst efficiency is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing device is divided into multiple stages with each stage performing a specific mixing function. The first mixing stage mixes reductant with exhaust gas, while the second mixing stage further mixes the mixture. This segmentation allows each stage to be simpler while collectively achieving uniform flow distribution, resolving the contradiction between catalyst efficiency and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces swirl flow by directing exhaust gas and reductant through tangential inlets that create rotational motion. This adds a dimensional aspect to the mixing process, using centrifugal forces generated by swirl flow to enhance mixing efficiency without requiring complex mechanical components, thus improving catalyst efficiency while maintaining device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional aftertreatment systems use complex components to achieve uniform flow distribution, then reductant distribution uniformity is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereductant distribution uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing device utilizes the exhaust gas flow itself to drive the mixing process. The swirl flow generated by the tangential inlets creates centrifugal forces that automatically distribute reductant uniformly without requiring external power sources or complex control mechanisms. This self-service approach achieves precise reductant distribution uniformity while keeping manufacturing costs low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the flow parameters by introducing swirl flow with specific rotational characteristics. By controlling the tangential inlet angles and the resulting swirl flow parameters, the system achieves uniform reductant distribution. This parameter-based control is simpler and less expensive to manufacture compared to mechanical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional aftertreatment systems use complex mixing components, then mixing efficiency is improved, but pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses curved surfaces and tangential inlets that guide the exhaust gas and reductant into a smooth rotational flow pattern. This curved geometry reduces flow separation and turbulence, creating a more efficient mixing process with lower pressure drop. The swirl flow path is designed to minimize energy losses while maintaining high mixing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The mixing device utilizes pneumatic principles by using the kinetic energy of the exhaust gas flow to drive the mixing process. The swirl flow creates centrifugal forces that enhance mixing without requiring additional mechanical energy input. This pneumatic approach achieves high mixing efficiency while minimizing pressure drop compared to mechanically-driven mixing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Productivity

If conventional aftertreatment systems use complex components, then mixing capability is improved, but deposit formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoiddeposit formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic swirl flow that continuously rotates the exhaust gas and reductant mixture. This dynamic mixing action prevents stagnant regions where deposits could form, while the controlled flow patterns ensure complete mixing. The rotational motion distributes thermal and mass gradients uniformly, reducing the conditions that lead to deposit formation on mixing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The multi-stage mixer achieves a uniform flow and reductant distribution, improving catalyst efficiency, reducing deposit formation, and allowing for easy scaling and cost-effective implementation across different applications.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of main vane apertures is configured to receive the exhaust gas and to cooperate with the plurality of main vanes to provide the exhaust gas from the first flow device with a swirl flow that facilitates mixing of the reductant and the exhaust gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirl flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

The first flow device includes a Venturi body, a plurality of main vanes, a plurality of main vane apertures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11982219B2Systems and methods for mixing exhaust gases and reductant in an aftertreatment system
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 CUMMINS EMISSION SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11982219B2 patent drawing
  • US11982219B2 patent drawing
  • US11982219B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-stage mixer includes a multi-stage mixer inlet, a multi-stage mixer outlet, a first flow device, and a second flow device. The multi-stage mixer inlet is configured to receive exhaust gas. The multi-stage mixer outlet is configured to provide the exhaust gas to a catalyst. The first flow device is configured to receive the exhaust gas from the multi-stage mixer inlet and to receive reductant such that the reductant is partially mixed with the exhaust gas within the first flow device. The first flow device includes a plurality of main vanes and a plurality of main vane apertures. The plurality of main vane apertures is interspaced between the plurality of main vanes. The plurality of main vane apertures is configured to receive the exhaust gas and to cooperate with the plurality of main vanes to provide the exhaust gas from the first flow device with a swirl flow.