Multi-Stage Mortality Prediction Using APACHE and MPM0 Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mortality prediction models for critically ill patients in ICUs, such as APACHE and MPM0, often provide disparate predictions due to differences in variables and time frames used, leading to a need for improved accuracy in predicting hospital mortality.

Innovation Solution

Concurrently utilizing both the APACHE and MPM0 mortality prediction models in a clinical computing environment, calculating a patient's mortality probability based on physiological data from the APACHE model and clinical data from the MPM0 model, and applying a logistic regression equation to combine these predictions, accounting for the difference between the two models' outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single mortality prediction model (APACHE or MPM0) is used, then the model complexity is low and ease of operation is maintained, but the predictive accuracy and reliability are insufficient due to disparate predictions from different models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemortality prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple mortality prediction models (APACHE and MPM0) into a single integrated system that simultaneously utilizes both models. The system merges the physiological parameters from APACHE with the admission data from MPM0, processing them through a unified computational framework to generate a comprehensive mortality prediction that leverages the strengths of both individual models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite prediction system that integrates different types of data (physiological parameters, demographic information, admission characteristics) from multiple models. This composite approach combines heterogeneous data sources and modeling methodologies into a unified predictive framework, similar to how composite materials combine different substances to achieve superior properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If multiple mortality prediction models are used concurrently, then the predictive accuracy is improved, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemortality prediction reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal computational platform that can handle multiple prediction models simultaneously. This multi-functional system processes various types of clinical data (physiological measurements, demographic information, admission details) through a single integrated algorithmic framework, eliminating the need for separate computational systems for each model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the prediction process into distinct computational modules: one module processes APACHE physiological parameters, another processes MPM0 admission data, and a final module integrates these results. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system coherence and managing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8417541B1Multi-stage model for predicting probabilities of mortality in adult critically ill patients
Publication Date: 2013.04.09 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US8417541B1 patent drawing
  • US8417541B1 patent drawing
  • US8417541B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computerized methods in a clinical computing environment for predicting mortality in critically ill patients, that is, patients admitted to Intensive Care Units, are provided. In accordance with embodiments hereof, at least two distinctly different mortality prediction models (e.g., the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHEĀ®) model and the Mortality Probability Model at Admission (MPM0) are utilized in a multi-stage fashion to determine, with better accuracy than may be provided by either mortality prediction model alone, the probability of mortality for critically ill adult patients.