Multi-Stage RF Signal Acquisition for Wide Doppler Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Satellite-based radio navigation systems face challenges in signal acquisition due to propagation delays, Doppler effects, and noise, particularly in multi-burst scenarios where signals from multiple satellites overlap, leading to high time and frequency uncertainty and computationally expensive search processes.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage signal acquisition technique involving a first stage for Doppler detection across a wide search range and a second stage for refined search, using a signal acquisition search engine that correlates signals in two dimensions of time code offset and Doppler frequency shift, with configurable thresholds and interpolation to minimize false alarms and missed detections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a wide search range is used to cover all possible Doppler shifts and time offsets, then the probability of signal detection is improved, but the computational complexity and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detection probabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The signal acquisition process is divided into multiple stages: a first stage that performs initial correlation over a wide Doppler range to identify candidate tones, and a second stage that performs refined correlation only on the most promising candidates. This segmentation allows the system to maintain comprehensive search coverage while significantly reducing overall computational complexity by filtering out unlikely candidates in the first stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first stage of processing performs preliminary correlation operations to pre-identify candidate tones before the second stage performs the final acquisition. By performing this preliminary action with lower computational cost, the system prepares a reduced set of candidates for the more expensive second stage, thereby reducing total computational burden while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple correlation stages are performed to improve signal discrimination accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal discrimination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The processing is segmented into two distinct stages with different objectives: the first stage performs broad correlation to identify candidate tones quickly, while the second stage performs targeted correlation only on the most promising candidates to achieve high precision. This segmentation enables the system to achieve accurate signal discrimination without the processing time penalty of performing exhaustive correlation at high precision levels throughout the entire search space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first stage performs correlation operations that are sufficient to identify candidates but do not achieve maximum precision, while the second stage applies more intensive correlation only to the top candidates. This partial action in the first stage combined with intensive action in the second stage achieves the desired precision for the final results without the time cost of applying intensive action to all possible tones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If correlation thresholds are set high to reduce false alarms, then measurement precision is improved, but the number of missed detections increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidsignal detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses different correlation thresholds appropriate to each stage: a lower threshold in the first stage to cast a wide net and capture all possible candidates (reducing missed detections), and a higher threshold in the second stage to filter out false alarms. This staged thresholding approach allows the system to maintain high detection rates while achieving low false alarm rates in the final output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first stage performs preliminary correlation with a lower threshold to ensure that all potential signals are captured in the candidate list, avoiding missed detections. The second stage then refines this list with a higher threshold to eliminate false alarms. This preliminary action with a lenient threshold ensures comprehensive initial coverage before stricter filtering is applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250277910A1Multi-stage multi-burst signal acquisition
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION ANDELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC
  • US20250277910A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277910A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277910A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A signal acquisition device includes a first stage processing module and a second stage processing module. The first stage processing module is configured to correlate a first set of a plurality of radio frequency (RF) signal samples to a plurality of generated tones, and to output a plurality of interpolated (candidate) tones each having first correlation magnitudes exceeding a first threshold value. The second stage processing module is configured to correlate a second set of the RF signal samples to a plurality of code signals, and to output a plurality of output tones each having second correlation magnitudes exceeding a second threshold value, where the second set of RF signal samples correspond to the interpolated tones.