Multi-Station Laser Cutting for Large Vehicle Structural Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser cutting systems for vehicle structural components are inefficient, requiring long cutting times and large manufacturing spaces, leading to reduced productivity and increased logistical challenges, especially for large components like door frames.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing multiple laser cutting stations with multi-axis robots and fixtures, allowing simultaneous cutting operations by multiple laser heads at each station, accompanied by automated grippers and inspection systems to enhance productivity and reduce space requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single laser cutting station is used, then the equipment complexity is low, but the cutting time is long and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidnumber of laser stations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cutting system into multiple independent laser stations (first laser station, second laser station, etc.), each capable of performing cutting operations simultaneously on different components or different areas. This segmentation allows parallel processing, significantly increasing overall productivity while keeping each individual station relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple laser stations into a coordinated system where they work in parallel on different components or areas. The control system merges their operations to achieve high-volume production, effectively combining the capabilities of multiple stations to overcome the productivity limitations of a single station without creating excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If multiple laser cutting stations are used to increase productivity, then the cutting time is reduced, but the manufacturing space increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput per hourVSAvoidmanufacturing space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent arranges multiple laser stations in a multi-dimensional layout rather than simply extending them in one direction. By utilizing vertical space and three-dimensional positioning, the system accommodates multiple stations within a compact footprint, increasing productivity without proportionally increasing the manufacturing floor space required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a nested arrangement where laser stations are positioned in a space-efficient configuration, with components and fixtures arranged to maximize utilization of available space. The system nests multiple cutting operations within a coordinated workflow that minimizes the overall area required while maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If multiple laser cutting stations are used, then productivity increases, but the logistical coordination and personnel requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of components cutVSAvoidlogistical coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated component handling and positioning systems that enable the laser stations to operate with minimal human intervention. The system automatically coordinates between stations, transfers components, and manages the cutting workflow, allowing the multi-station system to serve itself and reducing the need for additional personnel to manage the increased productivity capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates a centralized control system that monitors and coordinates the operations of multiple laser stations in real-time. The control system receives feedback from each station regarding cutting progress, component status, and operational parameters, automatically adjusting and coordinating activities across stations to maintain optimal productivity while simplifying logistical coordination through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method and system significantly reduce cutting times, increase productivity, and minimize manufacturing space, while maintaining high precision and quality, synchronizing with hot forming processes and reducing the need for additional equipment and personnel.

Implementation Method 1

a first plurality of areas of the component with the plurality of laser cutting heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

cutting a first plurality of areas of the component with the plurality of laser cutting heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser melting: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS20250205829A1Laser cutting systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 AUTOTECH ENG SL
  • US20250205829A1 patent drawing
  • US20250205829A1 patent drawing
  • US20250205829A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for laser cutting of components are disclosed herein. Examples are specifically suited for laser cutting relatively large components of e.g. a vehicle framework such as a unitary side panel of a vehicle door. Multiple robots may perform laser cutting operations substantially simultaneously.