Multi-Station Lithography System for Semiconductor Wafer Patterning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor wafer lithography processes are inefficient due to the need for all regions of a wafer to be written at a single station, leading to increased processing time and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a lithography system with multiple stations, where a wafer is transferred between photolithography and direct-beam write stations, allowing concurrent processing of different regions, thereby reducing the time a wafer occupies a single station and enhancing processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If all regions of a wafer are written at a single lithography station, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but productivity is reduced and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning precisionVSAvoidwafer processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wafer processing is segmented across multiple lithography stations (first lithography station for photolithography, second lithography station for direct-beam writing). Different regions of the wafer are processed at different stations, allowing parallel processing and improving productivity while maintaining precision at each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-station sequential processing model to a multi-station spatial distribution model. By adding the dimension of multiple stations, the system enables concurrent processing of different wafer regions, thereby increasing throughput without compromising the precision of individual patterning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a wafer is processed at a single lithography station, then process control is simplified, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control complexityVSAvoidwafer processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wafer is divided into different regions processed at different stations. The first region undergoes photolithography at the first station while the second region receives direct-beam writing at the second station, enabling time-saving parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-station system enables continuous useful action by eliminating idle time. While one region waits for processing, another region can be processed simultaneously at a different station, ensuring that the wafer is continuously productive throughout the lithography process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multiple lithography stations are implemented, then productivity and processing speed improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer processing throughputVSAvoidlithography system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Both lithography stations perform the fundamental function of patterning wafer regions, but with different techniques (photolithography and direct-beam writing). This multi-functionality allows the system to handle different processing requirements while maintaining a unified lithography workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary transfer mechanism (wafer transfer device or robotic system) that moves the wafer between stations. This intermediary enables coordinated operation of multiple stations without requiring complex integration, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Power

If concurrent processing at multiple stations is implemented, then processing efficiency improves, but coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidstation coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system monitors the processing status at both lithography stations and dynamically adjusts wafer transfer timing and processing parameters. This feedback mechanism ensures optimal coordination between stations, maintaining high processing efficiency while managing coordination complexity through real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces processing time and improves efficiency by allowing simultaneous patterning of multiple wafers across different stations, increasing productivity and yield in semiconductor fabrication.

Implementation Method 1

patterning a first region of the first semiconductor wafer by directing light from a light source through transparent regions of an optical mask

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotolithography: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

patterning a second region of the first semiconductor wafer by directing energy from an energy source to the second region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDirect-beam writing: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS11402761B2Semiconductor lithography system and/or method
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11402761B2 patent drawing
  • US11402761B2 patent drawing
  • US11402761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lithography method to pattern a first semiconductor wafer is disclosed. An optical mask is positioned over the first semiconductor wafer. A first region of the first semiconductor wafer is patterned by directing light from a light source through transparent regions of the optical mask. A second region of the first semiconductor wafer is patterned by directing energy from an energy source to the second region, wherein the patterning of the second region comprises direct-beam writing.