Multi-tank material balance model for reservoir simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Classical grid-based reservoir simulators are slow and resource-intensive, making them unsuitable for day-to-day production optimization decisions, and the general material balance equation lacks specificity for multi-tank reservoir situations.

Innovation Solution

A computer system divides a reservoir into multiple tank blocks that allow material transfer between adjacent blocks, determining flow rates based on pressure differences and performing dual porosity material balance analyses by evaluating volume changes and relative permeability in fracture and matrix tanks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If grid-based reservoir simulators are used, then accuracy of production forecasting is improved, but simulation speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of production forecastingVSAvoidsimulation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The reservoir is divided into multiple discrete tank blocks, each representing a distinct reservoir compartment. This segmentation allows the complex continuous reservoir to be modeled as a series of simpler, manageable units that can be processed more quickly while maintaining essential reservoir behavior characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the continuous reservoir model into a discrete multi-tank model by changing the mathematical representation from partial differential equations to algebraic material balance equations. This parameter change from continuous to discrete formulation significantly reduces computational complexity and simulation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If grid-based reservoir simulators are used, then accuracy of production forecasting is improved, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of production forecastingVSAvoidcomputational resources required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the reservoir into discrete tank blocks, the patent reduces the computational domain from a continuous grid requiring fine spatial discretization to a smaller number of representative volumes. This segmentation dramatically reduces the number of computational variables and equations that must be solved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-tank model uses simplified algebraic equations instead of complex differential equations, creating a computationally inexpensive model that can be rapidly executed. This disposable approach allows for frequent model updates and scenario analysis without significant computational investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If general material balance equation is used, then material balance determination is simplified, but applicability to specific multi-tank situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial balance determination simplicityVSAvoidapplicability to specific multi-tank situations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the general material balance concept by dividing the reservoir into multiple discrete tanks, each with its own material balance equation. This segmentation allows the simple GMBE approach to be applied to complex multi-tank configurations while maintaining the ease of algebraic calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-tank material balance model serves multiple functions: it can model single-tank reservoirs, multi-tank reservoirs, fractured reservoirs, and heterogeneous formations using the same fundamental algebraic framework. This universality maintains simplicity while adapting to various reservoir configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables fast and accurate material balance calculations, supporting timely operational decisions and improving the predictive power of reservoir simulations, especially in complex multi-tank and dual porosity reservoirs.

Implementation Method 1

determines a flow rate between the adjacent reservoir tank blocks proportional to the difference in tank block pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9945703B2Multi-tank material balance model
Publication Date: 2018.04.17 QRI GROUP
  • US9945703B2 patent drawing
  • US9945703B2 patent drawing
  • US9945703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to performing material balance analysis for tanks in a petroleum reservoir and to performing dual porosity material balance analysis. In one scenario, a computer system divides a reservoir into multiple tank blocks, where at least two tank blocks are adjacent. The adjacent tanks are connected at a tank block boundary so that materials are permitted to travel between the tank blocks. The computer system determines flow rate between adjacent tank blocks proportional to the difference in tank block pressures. Then, upon making this determination, the computer system determines material balance for at least some of the tank blocks in the reservoir through influx and efflux of material across the tank block boundary. The material balance includes a determined material balance for one of the adjacent tank blocks and a determined material balance for the other adjacent tank block.