Multi-Task Attention RNN for Efficient Representation Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional recurrent neural network (RNN) architectures face challenges in efficiently modeling temporal dependencies and handling multiple tasks or objectives, leading to high computational costs and labor-intensive processes, especially in applications like time-series classification and forecasting, where long-term temporal dependencies are crucial.

Innovation Solution

A multi-task architecture using deep attention-based uni-directional or bi-directional RNN models that optimize neural network architecture and task-grouping to achieve accurate predictions, allowing for automatic generation and evaluation of neural network structures, and leveraging temporal user behavior such as web browsing history or social media interactions to predict subsequent events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional RNN architectures are used for time-series classification and forecasting, then the model can process sequential data, but the computational cost and labor required to identify optimal network architecture increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated neural architecture search (NAS) where the system automatically explores and selects optimal RNN architectures without requiring manual intervention. The framework autonomously evaluates multiple architecture candidates using performance metrics and selects the best model, eliminating the need for extensive manual tuning and reducing computational overhead associated with trying multiple architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies key architectural parameters such as the number of RNN layers, hidden unit dimensions, and activation functions to identify optimal configurations. By automating this parameter exploration through structured search algorithms, the system efficiently navigates the architecture space without requiring exhaustive manual testing, thereby reducing computational costs while maintaining high model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If handcrafted cell structures and architectures are used, then the model structure can be designed with domain expertise, but the process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtime for architecture identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The automated architecture search framework performs the work that would otherwise require manual expert intervention. It independently explores the architecture space, evaluates candidates based on predefined metrics, and selects optimal structures without human involvement in the search process, dramatically reducing the time required compared to handcrafted design approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary exploration of architecture spaces by pre-evaluating multiple candidate structures before final model selection. This preliminary action allows the system to identify promising architectures early in the process, avoiding the need for extensive manual testing and refinement that would otherwise be required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional RNNs are used for multiple tasks, then the model can handle different objectives, but the difficulty in addressing multiple tasks simultaneously increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-task capabilityVSAvoidtask optimization difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a unified multi-task learning framework that enables a single RNN architecture to handle multiple related tasks simultaneously. By sharing common representation layers and using task-specific output heads, the model achieves multi-functionality without requiring separate specialized models for each task, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The framework merges multiple task objectives into a single unified model structure, combining related tasks that benefit from shared representations. This merging approach allows the system to handle multiple tasks with a single architecture rather than requiring separate models, simplifying the optimization process while maintaining versatility across different objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20220414470A1Multi-Task Attention Based Recurrent Neural Networks for Efficient Representation Learning
Publication Date: 2022.12.29 COGNITIV CORP
  • US20220414470A1 patent drawing
  • US20220414470A1 patent drawing
  • US20220414470A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods for leveraging temporal user behavior, such as web browsing history or social media interactions, to “predict” the occurrence and/or timing of one or more subsequent events. A multi-task architecture models temporal user-behavior with respect to single or multiple objectives and optimizes the neural network architecture and task-grouping to achieve the most accurate predictions. The deep attention-based uni-directional or bi-directional recurrent neural network (RNN) models that are part of the disclosed architecture can be used directly as an end-to-end prediction or inference system or can be used to generate learned representations of temporal data which can be extracted and used in a separate model or architecture.