Multi-tier Elevated Train Vertical Track Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional elevated train systems have a high visual impact and are costly to build and maintain, limiting their widespread implementation in urban areas, and they do not efficiently manage passenger seating and movement between tracks.

Innovation Solution

A multi-tier elevated train system with upper and lower tracks supported by a lightweight structure, allowing vehicles with upper and lower wheels to transition between tracks, reducing visual impact and cost, and incorporating features like seat indication systems and modular construction for efficient passenger management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional elevated train systems are implemented, then mass transit is provided, but visual impact on the urban landscape increases and construction costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transit capabilityVSAvoidvisual impact on urban landscape
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional single-level elevated tracks to a multi-tier vertical configuration where tracks are stacked at different heights. This dimensional change allows the system to maintain mass transit capability while reducing the horizontal footprint and visual dominance, as the structure extends vertically rather than horizontally across the urban landscape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested tracks where upper and lower tracks are vertically stacked and share common support structures. The upper track system is effectively nested within the vertical space above the lower track system, allowing both tracks to coexist in a compact configuration that reduces overall visual impact while maintaining full transit functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Productivity

If conventional elevated train systems are implemented, then mass transit is provided, but construction and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transit capabilityVSAvoidconstruction and maintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs support structures that serve multiple functions: they support both upper and lower tracks, provide attachment points for braking systems, and serve as structural columns for the entire multi-tier system. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of components needed and simplifies construction and maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the upper and lower track systems into a unified multi-tier structure where braking mechanisms, support columns, and structural elements serve both track levels simultaneously. This merging reduces redundant infrastructure and lowers overall construction and maintenance costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If vehicles transition between upper and lower tracks, then track capacity is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack capacity utilizationVSAvoidtrack switching mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediate transition sections with movable rails that act as mediators between the upper and lower tracks. These intermediary structures provide a smooth transition path for vehicles changing levels, simplifying the switching mechanism compared to direct lateral transfers while optimizing track capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If vehicle floor is elevated above platform level, then passenger entry efficiency is improved, but accessibility for wheeled vehicles is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger entry efficiencyVSAvoidaccessibility for wheeled vehicles
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamically adjustable platforms that can change height to match the vehicle floor level for standard passengers, improving entry efficiency. The same platforms can lower or extend to provide level access for wheeled vehicles, maintaining versatility through dynamic adaptation rather than fixed positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10787181B2Multiple tier elevated light train
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 CTRAIN CORP
  • US10787181B2 patent drawing
  • US10787181B2 patent drawing
  • US10787181B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for enabling elevated trains to travel both above as well as below a vertically-tiered pair of tracks by having wheels both in the upper and lower area of the train with the ability to switch from traveling on the upper tracks using lower wheels to traveling on the lower track using tipper wheels, where the said method of switching between upper and lower tracks enables trains to be moved between multiple levels serving as passing loops as well as vertical depots.