Multi-Tier Hardware Failure Prediction for Proactive Edge Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In modern information processing systems, particularly edge platforms, hardware updates and upgrades require significant planning and forecasting due to diverse device types and operational requirements, leading to complexity in monitoring and support processes that consume substantial bandwidth and resources.

Innovation Solution

A multi-tiered hardware management framework predicts failure and health attributes of datacenter devices using edge client modules, CDN servers, and backend servers, employing deduplication and machine learning to reduce communication footprint and improve support efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring and support processes are used for thousands of datacenter devices, then device management coverage is comprehensive, but bandwidth and compute resource usage become excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice management coverageVSAvoidbandwidth and compute resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the monitoring and support process into multiple tiers: edge platforms perform local deduplication and initial analysis, CDN servers handle regional aggregation, and backend servers perform centralized processing. This segmentation allows each tier to process only the data it needs, dramatically reducing overall bandwidth and compute resource requirements while maintaining comprehensive device management coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The edge platforms perform preliminary deduplication of device monitoring data before it is transmitted to CDN servers or backend servers. By performing this action locally at the source, the system prevents redundant data from being transmitted across the network, reducing bandwidth consumption while preserving the完整性 of device management information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If detailed tracking of each device is performed, then device-specific support accuracy is high, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice-specific support accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal failure prediction models and health indicator computations that can be applied across all device types. By establishing general patterns and behaviors at each tier, the system achieves high device-specific support accuracy without requiring complex device-type-specific tracking mechanisms, thus reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified representations of device data through deduplication at the edge platform level. Instead of transmitting complete detailed tracking information for each device, the system copies only the essential deduplicated data structures through the hierarchy, maintaining measurement precision while reducing the complexity of data handling at each tier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If proactive maintenance is implemented, then device failure prevention is improved, but computational requirements for prediction increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice failure preventionVSAvoidcomputational requirements for prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The computational burden of failure prediction is segmented across multiple tiers: edge platforms perform lightweight local predictions using simplified models, CDN servers perform regional aggregation and analysis, and backend servers perform comprehensive predictive analytics. This segmentation enables proactive maintenance while distributing computational requirements to avoid concentrating all processing at a single tier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each tier performs prediction computations to the extent necessary for its function. Edge platforms perform partial predictions sufficient for local monitoring, while more comprehensive predictions are performed at backend servers. This partial action approach enables proactive maintenance without requiring excessive computational resources at every tier simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12625753B2Hardware management based on failure prediction in a multi-tiered architecture
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 DELL PROD LP
  • US12625753B2 patent drawing
  • US12625753B2 patent drawing
  • US12625753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for hardware management in an information processing system. For example, a method obtains, at an edge platform, one or more failure prediction values for one or more device types of the edge platform, wherein a failure prediction value for a device type represents a likelihood of failure associated with the device type. The method, at the edge platform, computes one or more health indicator values for the one or more device types based on the one or more failure prediction values, computes one or more behavior indicator values for the one or more device types based on the one or more health indicator values. The method causes, in response to the one or more behavior indicator values for the one or more device types, determination of one or more proactive actions to be initiated prior to a failure of one or more devices of the edge platform.