Multi-tiered Threat Detection for Enterprise Email Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional secure email gateways struggle to detect novel and evolving malicious payloads in emails, as attackers increasingly hide malware and phishing attempts through obfuscation techniques, making it difficult to differentiate between legitimate and malicious communications in a timely and consistent manner.

Innovation Solution

A multi-tiered approach is employed by the threat detection platform, which includes behavioral and content analysis, link crawling, attachment processing, and payload attribute identification, allowing for the determination of threats without relying solely on payload analysis, and leveraging machine learning models to quantify and qualify the risk posed by communications in near real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional secure email gateways use predefined rules and payload analysis to detect malicious communications, then detection accuracy for known threats is improved, but the ability to detect novel and obfuscated malicious payloads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidability to detect novel threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is divided into multiple independent tiers: Tier 1 performs rapid behavioral analysis of communication patterns, Tier 2 conducts content analysis, and Tier 3 performs deep payload inspection. Each tier operates with different detection strategies, allowing the system to maintain high accuracy for known threats while adapting to novel threats through the collective strength of multiple specialized detection layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes detection parameters based on the communication being analyzed. For each communication, the system adjusts which tiers are activated and what detection thresholds are applied, allowing it to optimize between speed and accuracy depending on the suspected threat level, thereby maintaining both high detection accuracy and adaptability to new threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive payload analysis is performed on all incoming communications, then detection capability is improved, but processing time and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary behavioral analysis in Tier 1 before conducting more time-consuming payload analysis. By pre-assessing communication patterns and identifying suspicious behaviors early, the system can determine which communications require deep payload inspection and which can be processed more quickly, thereby maintaining high detection capability while reducing overall processing time through selective analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial payload analysis to most communications and excessive (full) payload analysis only to suspicious communications identified by Tier 1 behavioral analysis. This selective approach ensures that detection capability is maintained for all communications while processing time is optimized by applying comprehensive analysis only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multi-tiered analysis is applied to all communications, then threat detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The three tiers of analysis share common infrastructure components, including the communication data intake mechanism, the user computing environment interface, and the remediation systems. This universal foundation allows the system to achieve high threat detection accuracy through multi-tiered analysis while reducing complexity by avoiding duplication of infrastructure across tiers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Stability of the object's composition

If reliance is placed on predefined rules for payload detection, then consistency in detection is improved, but ability to identify obfuscated malicious communications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection consistencyVSAvoidability to identify obfuscated threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where detection results from all tiers are analyzed and used to refine detection rules and models. Behavioral patterns identified in Tier 1 and content analysis results from Tier 2 feed back into adjusting payload detection rules, creating a dynamic system that maintains consistency through structured feedback while improving adaptability to obfuscated threats through continuous learning from actual communication patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11831661B2Multi-tiered approach to payload detection for incoming communications
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 ABNORMAL AI INC
  • US11831661B2 patent drawing
  • US11831661B2 patent drawing
  • US11831661B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plurality of features associated with a message are determined. At least one feature included in the plurality of features is associated with a payload of the message. A determination is made that supplemental analysis should be performed on the message. The determination is based at least in part on performing behavioral analysis using at least some of the features included in the plurality of features. Supplemental analysis is performed.