Multi-Tile GPU Memory Management for Cross-Tile Access Migration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphics processing units (GPUs) face challenges in efficiently managing data across multiple tiles for parallel processing, particularly in machine learning operations, leading to suboptimal performance and increased latency due to inefficient data access and migration mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a unified memory address space and a distributed memory model that enables cross-tile access and multicast data copying, along with an optimal page migration mechanism, to facilitate efficient data sharing and processing across multiple GPUs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a distributed memory model with unified address space is implemented across multiple tiles, then data sharing and access efficiency improve, but system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sharing efficiencyVSAvoidmemory management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified memory address space is segmented into tile-specific regions, allowing each tile to have its own memory management unit (MMU) that independently manages local memory pages while participating in the global address space. This segmentation reduces coordination overhead by enabling autonomous memory management at each tile level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A memory management unit (MMU) acts as an intermediary between the unified virtual address space and the distributed physical memory across tiles. The MMU handles address translation, page table management, and cross-tile memory access coordination, isolating the complexity from application code while enabling efficient data sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If cross-tile access mechanisms are enabled for efficient data sharing, then processing speed improves, but latency increases due to additional access overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmemory access latency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Data is pre-loaded and cached in local tile memory before being needed for processing. The system predicts which data will be needed across tile boundaries and proactively transfers it to local caches, reducing the latency of cross-tile accesses during actual processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The memory hierarchy is extended by adding a temporal dimension through caching mechanisms. Frequently accessed data across tile boundaries is maintained in intermediate cache layers, creating a multi-level memory structure that reduces the frequency and impact of slow cross-tile memory accesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If page migration mechanisms are implemented to optimize data placement, then memory utilization improves, but system overhead and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory allocation flexibilityVSAvoidpage migration overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory management system implements self-service page migration where data pages automatically migrate between tiles based on their access patterns and workload requirements. The MMU monitors memory usage and autonomously relocates pages without requiring explicit software intervention, reducing the overhead of manual memory management while improving utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback-driven page migration by monitoring memory access patterns, page fault rates, and tile utilization metrics. Based on this feedback, the memory management unit dynamically adjusts page placement and migration decisions, optimizing memory utilization while adapting to changing workload conditions without excessive overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240345990A1Multi-tile Memory Management for Detecting Cross Tile Access Providing Multi-Tile Inference Scaling and Providing Page Migration
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 INTEL CORP
  • US20240345990A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345990A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345990A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Multi-tile Memory Management for Detecting Cross Tile Access, Providing Multi-Tile Inference Scaling with multicasting of data via copy operation, and Providing Page Migration are disclosed herein. In one embodiment, a graphics processor for a multi-tile architecture includes a first graphics processing unit (GPU) having a memory and a memory controller, a second graphics processing unit (GPU) having a memory and a cross-GPU fabric to communicatively couple the first and second GPUs. The memory controller is configured to determine whether frequent cross tile memory accesses occur from the first GPU to the memory of the second GPU in the multi-GPU configuration and to send a message to initiate a data transfer mechanism when frequent cross tile memory accesses occur from the first GPU to the memory of the second GPU.