Multi-Tile Memory Management for GPU Query Decompression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data processing systems, particularly graphics processors, face challenges in efficiently processing a wide variety of operations due to limitations in their architectural design and processing techniques.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a general-purpose graphics processing unit (GPU) with host/processor cores to accelerate operations such as graphics, machine-learning, pattern analysis, and general-purpose GPU functions, utilizing techniques like pipelining and SIMT architectures to maximize parallel processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If fixed function computational units are used to process graphics data, then processing speed is improved, but adaptability to different operations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidoperational adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a unified computational unit that can perform multiple operations including rasterization, tessellation, and ray tracing through a single programmable architecture. The unified shader cores and shared memory resources enable the same hardware to execute different graphics operations by loading appropriate shader programs, eliminating the need for separate fixed-function units for each operation type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If portions of graphics processors are made programmable, then operational versatility is improved, but processing efficiency for specific operations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational versatilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics through dynamic thread scheduling and runtime code generation that adapts the programmable units to perform specialized operations with fixed-function efficiency. The system dynamically compiles and loads optimized shader code for specific operations (e.g., tessellation shaders, ray tracing shaders) into the programmable cores, allowing them to execute specific tasks with high efficiency while maintaining the ability to switch to different operations as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If pipelining techniques are implemented to process graphics data in parallel, then throughput is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the graphics processing pipeline into distinct stages (vertex processing, tessellation, rasterization, fragment processing, ray tracing) that can operate in parallel on different data streams. Each stage is implemented as a separate processing pass that can be independently optimized and scheduled, reducing the complexity of coordinating all operations while maintaining high throughput through parallel execution of multiple passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If SIMT architecture is used to maximize parallel processing, then processing capacity is improved, but thread synchronization overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel processing capacityVSAvoidsynchronization overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by allowing different thread groups to execute different numbers of iterations or skip certain processing stages based on their specific needs. Threads can exit early from processing passes when their conditions are met, avoiding unnecessary synchronization wait times. The system launches variable numbers of thread groups for different operations (e.g., fewer threads for simple rasterization, more threads for complex ray tracing) to optimize parallel capacity while minimizing synchronization overhead for each specific task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3938915B1Multi-tile memory management
Publication Date: 2025.06.04 INTEL CORP
  • EP3938915B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3938915B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3938915B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Methods and apparatus relating to techniques for multi-tile memory management. In an example, an apparatus comprises a cache memory, a high-bandwidth memory, a shader core communicatively coupled to the cache memory and comprising a processing element to decompress a first data element extracted from an in-memory database in the cache memory and having a first bit length to generate a second data element having a second bit length, greater than the first bit length, and an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) to compare the data element to a target value provided in a query of the in-memory database. Other embodiments are also disclosed and claimed.