Multi-TRP Beam Reporting Using Prediction for Low-Overhead Reception

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication networks face challenges in efficiently managing beamforming and multi-TRP operations due to high overhead and latency in beam reporting, particularly in scenarios where simultaneous reception from multiple TRPs is desired.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a group-based beam reporting mechanism using artificial intelligence/machine learning models to predict and report suitable beam pairs for simultaneous reception, reducing overhead and latency by utilizing prediction models to determine beam groups for multi-TRP communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional beam reporting mechanisms are used for multi-TRP communication, then beam measurement and reporting can be performed, but reference signal overhead and latency increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam reporting accuracyVSAvoidreference signal overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam reporting process into two distinct phases: an indication phase where the UE reports only the best beam index, and a subsequent reporting phase where detailed beam information is provided. This segmentation reduces the amount of reference signal overhead required at any given time while maintaining comprehensive beam measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary beam indication where the UE first identifies and reports the best beam index before performing detailed measurements on beam pairs. This preliminary action allows the network to pre-configure resource allocation and reduce subsequent reference signal overhead for beam pair measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive beam measurement and reporting is performed for all beam pairs, then accurate beam selection is achieved, but latency increases due to extensive measurement requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam measurement accuracyVSAvoidbeam reporting latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary identification of the best beam index before conducting detailed beam pair measurements. This preliminary action narrows down the measurement scope, allowing accurate beam selection to be achieved with fewer measurements and reduced latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement process is segmented into initial best-beam identification followed by targeted beam pair measurements. This segmentation avoids the need to perform exhaustive measurements on all possible beam pairs simultaneously, thereby reducing latency while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If all beam pairs are measured and reported for simultaneous reception, then complete beam group information is obtained, but overhead and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam group configuration flexibilityVSAvoidbeam reporting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments beam group reporting by first identifying individual best beams and then forming beam groups based on these indications. This segmentation allows the network to configure beam groups with appropriate flexibility while reducing the complexity of reporting all possible beam combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary beam indication to identify suitable beams before configuring beam groups for simultaneous reception. This preliminary action provides the network with advance information to optimize beam group configuration, reducing processing complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260019125A1Control mechanism for multi transmission reception point communication
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20260019125A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019125A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for use by a communication element or communication function capable of conducting multi transmission and reception point, TRP, operation, the apparatus comprising at least one processing circuitry, and at least one memory for storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to obtain channel state information reporting configuration information for enabling group-based beam reporting based on prediction (S510), to receive a plurality of beams comprising at least one set of beams for measurement and at least one set of beams of prediction (S520), to determine an association of the received plurality of beams to a respective TRP of a communication network (S530), to measure resources from the at least one set of beams for measurement for identifying beam groups for simultaneous reception (S540), and to determine further beam groups usable for simultaneous reception by using a prediction model (S550), wherein the further beam groups comprise beams of the at least one set of beams for measurement and the at least one set of beams for prediction.