Multi-TRP Uplink Priority Handling at SSB Collisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, especially in multi-TRP inter-cell configurations, there is a challenge in managing potential collisions between uplink transmissions and synchronization signal blocks (SSBs), which can lead to inefficiencies and disruptions in communication.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving signaling indicating an SSB set for a second cell, detecting potential collisions between scheduled uplink transmissions and SSBs, and transmitting the uplink transmission when specific conditions are met, allowing for flexible transmission even in cases of potential collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UE refrains from transmitting uplink transmission when collision with SSB is detected, then interference between uplink and downlink is avoided, but transmission efficiency and data delivery timeliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidtransmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic transmission decision-making by evaluating multiple conditions (collision detection, priority determination, network configuration) rather than using a static refrain-from-transmission rule. The UE dynamically adjusts its transmission behavior based on real-time collision detection and priority assessment, allowing high-priority transmissions to proceed while avoiding low-priority conflicts with SSB.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the transmission parameter state by introducing priority levels and condition-based decision criteria. Instead of a binary transmit/don't-transmit rule, the system evaluates transmission priority, collision timing, and network configuration parameters to determine the optimal action, effectively changing the parameter space from simple collision avoidance to multi-factor decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the UE transmits uplink data regardless of SSB collision, then transmission efficiency is maintained, but interference with downlink synchronization signals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating transmission behavior based on data priority and collision characteristics. High-priority transmissions are allowed to proceed even with SSB collision, while low-priority transmissions are suppressed. This localized quality control ensures that critical communications maintain efficiency while non-critical transmissions avoid causing harmful interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful collision scenario into a beneficial outcome by using priority-based decision-making. When collision is detected, the system evaluates whether the uplink transmission is high-priority; if so, the collision is accepted as a necessary trade-off, and the transmission proceeds. This transforms what would normally be harmful interference into an acceptable condition for maintaining critical communication flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If the network configures SSB set for second cell, then synchronization and cell management are improved, but complexity of resource coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesynchronizationVSAvoidresource coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the network pre-configure the SSB set for the second cell before the UE needs to make transmission decisions. The network entity provides advance information about SSB configurations, timing, and associated priorities through RRC signaling or other configuration mechanisms. This preliminary configuration reduces the computational burden on the UE during real-time collision detection and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12349087B2Managing potential collision between uplink transmission and synchronization signal block (SSB)
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12349087B2 patent drawing
  • US12349087B2 patent drawing
  • US12349087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for detecting a potential collision between a scheduled uplink transmission and a synchronization signal block (SSB) and transmitting the scheduled uplink transmission. For example, in cases of inter-cell multi-transmission and reception points (multi-TRP), a user equipment (UE) may not be capable of simultaneously transmitting and receiving on the multiple serving cells. A first serving cell may indicate to the UE of SSB indices that are actually transmitted for a second serving cell. If there is a slot collision between one of the SSB to be transmitted and a scheduled uplink transmission, the UE may not be able to handle such collision. The present disclosure provides techniques for detecting a potential collision between a scheduled uplink transmission and one of the SSBs and transmitting the scheduled uplink transmission when one or more conditions are met.