Multi-UAS Mission Planning With Adaptive Flight Reassignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack an efficient method to plan and manage multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) performing adaptive missions, particularly in handling unexpected conditions and UAS behavior during data collection tasks.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that manages a fleet of UAS collaboratively performing a mission by receiving mission requirements, calculating data acquisition points and flight plans, verifying UAS locations, and adjusting flight plans based on discrepancies and changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a plurality of UAS are used to perform data collection missions, then productivity and data acquisition capability are improved, but device complexity and coordination difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata acquisition capabilityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the mission area into discrete geographic cells and assigns specific cells to individual UAS. Each UAS is responsible for covering its assigned cells and collecting data from data acquisition points within those cells. This segmentation reduces coordination complexity by localizing each UAS's responsibilities while maintaining overall mission productivity through parallel operations across multiple cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculation of data acquisition points and flight plans before the mission begins. The central system computes optimal flight paths, assigns cells to UAS, and prepares contingency plans in advance. This preliminary action reduces real-time coordination complexity while enabling high productivity during actual data collection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If preprogrammed flight paths are used for UAS, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to unexpected field conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight path controlVSAvoidresponse to unexpected conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors each UAS's actual position during flight and compares it to the expected position from the preprogrammed flight plan. When discrepancies exceed a threshold, the system automatically recalculates flight paths and redistributes cell assignments to accommodate the unexpected condition. This feedback mechanism maintains ease of operation through automated responses while achieving high adaptability to field conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The flight plans are designed to be dynamic rather than static. While initial flight paths are preprogrammed for ease of operation, the system continuously updates these paths based on real-time UAS performance and environmental conditions. This allows the system to maintain simple preprogrammed structures while adapting dynamically to unexpected situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual planning and division of labor between multiple UAS is performed, then adaptability to specific mission requirements is improved, but loss of time in planning and coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission customizationVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical planning processes with automated computational systems. The central system automatically calculates data acquisition points, optimizes flight paths, and assigns cells to UAS based on mission requirements and UAS capabilities. This substitution maintains high adaptability to custom mission requirements while eliminating the time loss associated with manual planning and coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If flight plans are frequently adjusted during mission, then adaptability to field conditions is improved, but reliability and mission completion certainty deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to field conditionsVSAvoidmission completion certainty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs continuous feedback monitoring of UAS position and performance, triggering flight plan adjustments only when necessary based on objective discrepancy thresholds. This controlled feedback approach maintains reliability by avoiding unnecessary adjustments while achieving necessary adaptability when field conditions actually require changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes flight plan parameters systematically based on measured deviations. Rather than making arbitrary adjustments, the system modifies flight paths and cell assignments based on quantified position discrepancies and performance data. This parameter-based approach maintains mission reliability while enabling systematic adaptation to field conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12204347B2System and method for managing multiple UAS performing an adaptive mission
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 VHIVE TECH LTD
  • US12204347B2 patent drawing
  • US12204347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized system and method for managing a fleet of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) collaboratively performing a mission. The system receives mission requirements comprising mission goals, area of operation, characteristics of each UAS and calculates data acquisition points in the area of operation according to mission goals, sensor types and constraints. It then calculates a flight plan for each UAS. Once flying in the field, the system verifies for each UAS at predetermined intervals during flight the UAS' aerial location at that time and compares the UAS aerial location to the expected aerial location according to flight plan in that time. If necessary, adjustments are made to the flight plan of one or more UAS. Other considerations for flight adjustments are battery power level, mission goal accomplishments, signal quality and more.