Multi-UAV Confrontation Control With Modular Mission Assignment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing single-UAV strategic confrontation systems are inadequate for multi-UAV cooperative strategic confrontation due to challenges with fast-changing surroundings, unstable communication, anti-collision, information fusion, and mission allocation in complex aerial warfare scenarios.
Innovation Solution
A control system for multi-UAV cooperative strategic confrontation is developed, comprising a management module, UAV formation module, situation assessment module, decision-making module, and cooperative mission assigning module, which acquires and analyzes state information, assesses situations, and generates optimal countermeasures for UAV formations, enabling coordinated mission execution and visualization of tactical processes.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a conventional single-UAV strategic confrontation system is used, then the system structure is simple, but it cannot meet the requirements of multi-UAV cooperative strategic confrontation research
Solution Approach 1:
The control system is divided into five independent functional modules: management module, UAV formation module, situation assessment module, decision-making module, and cooperative mission assigning module. Each module handles specific tasks in the multi-UAV confrontation process, allowing the system to be adapted to multi-UAV cooperative scenarios while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.
2Productivity
If multi-UAV cooperative strategic confrontation is implemented, then mission execution efficiency is improved, but information fusion and mission allocation become more complex
Solution Approach 1:
Information fusion and mission allocation are segmented into distinct functional modules. The situation assessment module handles information fusion by acquiring and processing state information from multiple UAVs, while the cooperative mission assigning module separately handles mission allocation based on assessment results. This segmentation improves mission execution efficiency by enabling parallel processing of information fusion and allocation tasks.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where the management module stores and manages state information from UAVs, which is then processed by the situation assessment module. The assessment results feed into the decision-making module, which generates mission assignments that are fed back to the UAV formation module for execution. This closed-loop feedback structure optimizes information fusion and mission allocation efficiency.
3Reliability
If multi-UAV cooperative strategic confrontation is implemented, then overall combat level is improved, but anti-collision and communication stability become more difficult to maintain
Solution Approach 1:
Anti-collision and communication management functions are segmented into the UAV formation module, which specifically handles formation control and collision avoidance, and the management module, which manages communication and state information transmission. This segmentation allows the system to maintain higher overall combat levels while managing the complexity of anti-collision and communication through dedicated subsystems.
Solution Approach 2:
The management module acts as an intermediary between multiple UAVs, centralizing the management of state information and coordination tasks. By introducing this intermediary layer, the system can maintain stable communication and effective anti-collision protocols across multiple UAVs without requiring direct peer-to-peer coordination, thus managing complexity while improving overall combat capability.
Data Source
AI summary
The control system based on multi-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) cooperative strategic confrontation includes a management module, a UAV formation module, a situation assessment module, a decision-making module, and a cooperative mission assigning module of both sides in a confrontation. The management module is configured to store state information acquired by the UAV formation module. The UAV formation module is configured to acquire state information of UAVs and execute a control instruction. The situation assessment module is configured to acquire situation assessment information according to the state information. The decision-making module is configured to acquire a countermeasure based on the situation assessment information. The cooperative mission assigning module is configured to generate control instructions for the UAVs based on the countermeasure and in combination with a confrontation target and an optimal situation assessment value.