Multi-Vehicle Area Coverage Optimization via Discretized Subregion Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for task allocation and route planning in search missions involving multiple mobile platforms with varying capabilities and changing environmental conditions are inefficient, as they fail to adapt to real-time changes and do not effectively allocate resources to minimize time and cost while ensuring target detection in complex geographic regions.

Innovation Solution

A mission planning system comprising a discretizer subsystem to divide the search area into subregions based on vehicle capabilities and environmental conditions, a task allocator subsystem for optimal allocation of vehicles, and a path optimizer subsystem to determine the most efficient paths, along with an arbitrator for real-time adjustments to vehicle responsibilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple mobile platforms with varying capabilities are used to search a geographic region, then the coverage area and detection capability are improved, but the task allocation complexity and computational burden increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection capabilityVSAvoidtask allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The search region is divided into multiple subregions, and the task allocation problem is segmented into discrete decision variables for each vehicle-subregion pair. This segmentation transforms the continuous optimization problem into a discrete assignment problem that can be solved using combinatorial optimization techniques, reducing computational complexity while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter representation from continuous coordinates to discrete task assignments. By formulating the problem in terms of discrete variables (which vehicle performs which task), the system enables the use of efficient discrete optimization algorithms rather than continuous optimization methods, significantly reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If traditional task allocation methods are used without real-time adaptation, then the system simplicity is maintained, but the efficiency and response to environmental changes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms where vehicles report their status, environmental conditions are continuously monitored, and the task allocation is dynamically adjusted based on this feedback. This closed-loop control enables the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining computational tractability through structured re-optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The task allocation system transitions from static to dynamic operation, allowing real-time reassignment of tasks based on changing environmental conditions and vehicle capabilities. This dynamic adaptation improves search efficiency by responding to actual conditions rather than relying on pre-planned static allocations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If homogeneous mobile platforms are used, then the task allocation problem is simpler to solve, but the adaptability to different search conditions and vehicle capabilities is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle capability adaptabilityVSAvoidallocation problem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns different capabilities and roles to different vehicles based on their specific characteristics. Each vehicle's task allocation is optimized according to its local qualities (speed, sensor capabilities, payload), rather than treating all vehicles identically. This local optimization approach maintains adaptability while structuring the problem for computational solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8620510B1Adaptive multi-vehicle area coverage optimization system and method
Publication Date: 2013.12.31 THE BOEING CO
  • US8620510B1 patent drawing
  • US8620510B1 patent drawing
  • US8620510B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mission planning system for determining an optimum use of a plurality of vehicles in searching a predefined geographic area (PGA). A discretizer subsystem may be used for sensing the capabilities of each vehicle to produce a point set defining a number of points within the PGA that the vehicles must traverse to completely search the PGA. A task allocator subsystem may determine an optimum division of the PGA into different subregions to be handled by specific ones of the vehicles, thus to minimize an overall time needed to search the PGA. A path optimizer subsystem may determine an optimum path through a particular vehicle's assigned subregion to minimize the time needed for each specific vehicle to traverse its associated subregion.