Multi-View Part Classification for Morphologically Similar Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing classification methods based on camera images are insufficient for parts with significant morphological similarity and inadequate lighting conditions, leading to inaccurate classification.

Innovation Solution

A device and method using multiple cameras with diverse positions and orientations to capture images, combined with a processor that segments, defines characteristic functions, and compares them to reference models to determine proximity, allowing accurate classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single camera is used to capture part images, then the device complexity is low, but the classification precision is insufficient for parts with morphological similarity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the classification task into multiple independent camera observations. Each camera captures images from its specific viewpoint, and the processor integrates these segmented observations to achieve comprehensive classification. This segmentation allows the system to handle morphologically similar parts by examining them from multiple angles simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processor merges information from multiple camera views to create a comprehensive representation of the part. By combining the observations from different cameras, the system achieves higher classification precision than any single camera could provide alone, while managing complexity through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If multiple cameras with different positions and orientations are used, then the classification precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each camera in the array serves multiple functions: capturing images from its specific viewpoint, providing data for 3D reconstruction, and contributing to the classification process. This multi-functionality justifies the increased device complexity by maximizing the utility of each additional camera.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from 2D single-view images to 3D multi-view observations. By adding the spatial dimension of multiple camera positions and orientations, the system gains the ability to distinguish between morphologically similar parts that would be indistinguishable in a single view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If contour information is used for classification, then the method is simple, but the classification precision is insufficient when parts have similar contours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precisionVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system nests multiple levels of analysis: contour extraction at the basic level, 3D shape reconstruction at an intermediate level, and classification at the highest level. This nested structure allows the system to progressively refine the classification by adding layers of complexity only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The processor acts as an intermediary that transforms raw camera images into classified results. It mediates between the simple contour extraction and the complex 3D classification task, using intermediate representations like 3D models and feature vectors to bridge the gap between simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250218158A1Device And Method For Classifying Parts
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 INST TECHCO DE INFORMATICA
  • US20250218158A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218158A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218158A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a device for classifying parts in accordance with a specific part model with a known three-dimensional shape. The present invention also relates to a method for carrying out such classification. As a result of the classification, the device and the method are capable of determining whether a specific part corresponds to one of the models taken as a reference.